|  
  CoC at Whilton this weekend  by 'TKM177'  << You are here! 
   Re: CoC at Whilton this weekend  by 'Avago'   (24 Nov 2008 @ 8:47) 
    Who was the CoC at Whilton this weekend  by 'rotaxdave'   (24 Nov 2008 @ 9:31) 
     Re: Who was the CoC at Whilton this weekend  by 'Smith43'   (24 Nov 2008 @ 9:43) 
    Re: CoC at Whilton this weekend  by 'cadet44'   (24 Nov 2008 @ 10:44) 
    Anyone who didn't take the original start is.....  by 'SteveC'   (24 Nov 2008 @ 11:24) 
     Re: Anyone who didn't take the original start is..  by 'JPG'   (24 Nov 2008 @ 13:24) 
      Not relevant to being allowed to restart!  by 'SteveC'   (25 Nov 2008 @ 8:04) 
     Re: Anyone who didn't take the original start is..  by 'alanrr'   (24 Nov 2008 @ 14:11) 
      Re: Anyone who didn't take the original start is..  by 'LRT'   (24 Nov 2008 @ 15:02) 
   Re: CoC at Whilton this weekend  by 'kartcollector'   (24 Nov 2008 @ 17:17) 
    Re: CoC at Whilton this weekend  by 'Sticky'   (24 Nov 2008 @ 20:43) 
     The pole man is responsible for a pace that.....  by 'SteveC'   (25 Nov 2008 @ 8:09) 
      Re: The pole man is responsible for a pace that...  by 'davidmc'   (25 Nov 2008 @ 9:21) 
      Re: The pole man is responsible for a pace that...  by 'Sticky'   (25 Nov 2008 @ 15:38) 
       Re: The pole man is responsible for a pace that...  by 'itpro'   (25 Nov 2008 @ 15:45) 
        Rubbish, a driver needs to do the sensible thing!  by 'SteveC'   (27 Nov 2008 @ 10:42) 
        Re: The pole man is responsible for a pace that...  by 'davidmc'   (27 Nov 2008 @ 12:35) 
         Re: The pole man is responsible for a pace that...  by 'itpro'   (27 Nov 2008 @ 12:56) 
          Re: The pole man is responsible for a pace that...  by 'davidmc'   (27 Nov 2008 @ 13:16) 
           David  by 'itpro'   (27 Nov 2008 @ 14:36) 
            Re: David  by 'davidmc'   (27 Nov 2008 @ 18:24) 
             Re: David  by 'itpro'   (27 Nov 2008 @ 20:10) 
          Re: The pole man is responsible for a pace that...  by 'chriskasch'   (27 Nov 2008 @ 13:20) 
       The speed trap is only on the start line......  by 'SteveC'   (27 Nov 2008 @ 10:46) 
        Re: The speed trap is only on the start line......  by 'davidmc'   (27 Nov 2008 @ 12:45) 
         Re: The speed trap is only on the start line......  by 'itpro'   (27 Nov 2008 @ 13:02) 
          Re: The speed trap is only on the start line......  by 'davidmc'   (27 Nov 2008 @ 13:20) 
           Re: The speed trap is only on the start line......  by 'itpro'   (27 Nov 2008 @ 20:18) 
            Starting speeds another example of officials....  by 'QuickOldTimer'   (27 Nov 2008 @ 20:46) 
             You've obviously never used a pace kart for.......  by 'SteveC'   (28 Nov 2008 @ 10:35) 
              Re: You've obviously never used a pace kart for...  by 'chriskasch'   (28 Nov 2008 @ 10:40) 
               The current method of starting and the reg to.....  by 'SteveC'   (28 Nov 2008 @ 11:04) 
                Re: The current method of starting and the reg to.  by 'KartingPete'   (28 Nov 2008 @ 11:35) 
                 That would be like timing the rolling lap!  by 'SteveC'   (28 Nov 2008 @ 12:22) 
                  Re: That would be like timing the rolling lap!  by 'KartingPete'   (28 Nov 2008 @ 12:47) 
                   Not having a grid of clean engines causes  by 'SteveC'   (28 Nov 2008 @ 12:53) 
                    Re: Not having a grid of clean engines causes  by 'itpro'   (28 Nov 2008 @ 13:03) 
                     Some kerbs yes, some kerbs no!  by 'SteveC'   (29 Nov 2008 @ 8:25) 
                      Re: Some kerbs yes, some kerbs no!  by 'itpro'   (29 Nov 2008 @ 12:22) 
                       The norm for karting is! (just for your......  by 'SteveC'   (29 Nov 2008 @ 13:22) 
                        Re: The norm for karting is! (just for your......  by 'itpro'   (30 Nov 2008 @ 14:49) 
                         Disc protectors are a CIK thing!  by 'SteveC'   (03 Dec 2008 @ 9:54) 
              Re: You've obviously never used a pace kart for...  by 'QuickOldTimer'   (28 Nov 2008 @ 11:00) 
               You've obviously not written regs before!  by 'SteveC'   (28 Nov 2008 @ 11:11) 
            There far from a perfect comparison!  by 'SteveC'   (28 Nov 2008 @ 8:50) 
           The off side reg hasn't changed in modern......  by 'SteveC'   (28 Nov 2008 @ 8:46) 
            Wrong again..... Steve!  by 'itpro'   (28 Nov 2008 @ 12:03) 
             Totally right, davidmc doesn't mention hockey!  by 'SteveC'   (28 Nov 2008 @ 12:27) 
              Re: Totally right, davidmc doesn't mention hockey!  by 'itpro'   (28 Nov 2008 @ 13:07) 
               http://www.karting.co.uk/notice/Message.asp?FID=1&  by 'SteveC'   (29 Nov 2008 @ 8:29) 
                ...... and the TITLE read..........  by 'itpro'   (29 Nov 2008 @ 12:24) 
                 However should you work out how to follow a.....  by 'SteveC'   (29 Nov 2008 @ 13:27) 
                  Re: However should you work out how to follow a...  by 'itpro'   (30 Nov 2008 @ 14:52) 
                   Safari makes it obvious!  by 'SteveC'   (02 Dec 2008 @ 13:07) 
                 I'm so sorry Ian, I've only just realised!  by 'SteveC'   (29 Nov 2008 @ 13:41) 
             Hockey again!  by 'SteveC'   (29 Nov 2008 @ 13:29) 
             Just a test!  by 'itpro'   (30 Nov 2008 @ 14:55) 
              No, that would be your reply to your own post! nt  by 'SteveC'   (02 Dec 2008 @ 13:10) 
          Not so, football regs state very clearly that  by 'SteveC'   (28 Nov 2008 @ 8:44) 
          If I was talking about hockey off side, I would...  by 'SteveC'   (29 Nov 2008 @ 13:29) 
           Errrrr...... go on then.... explain it!  by 'itpro'   (30 Nov 2008 @ 14:58) 
            You're using an inferior browser!  by 'SteveC'   (02 Dec 2008 @ 13:08) 
             Re: You're using an inferior browser!  by 'itpro'   (02 Dec 2008 @ 17:05) 
              You've tested it on Safari on a PC!  by 'SteveC'   (03 Dec 2008 @ 9:56) 
               Re: You've tested it on Safari on a PC!  by 'itpro'   (03 Dec 2008 @ 10:24) 
                I don't think it was ever intended to do so!  by 'SteveC'   (04 Dec 2008 @ 9:09) 
                 Just for the avoidance of doubt!  by 'SteveC'   (04 Dec 2008 @ 9:51) 
   RE:TKM 177  by 'Beezo'   (24 Nov 2008 @ 21:11) 
    RE:TKM 177  by 'TKM177'   (25 Nov 2008 @ 17:26) 
 |