UK Karting

Notice Board (General Karting)




Re: No ! , the original qustion was...
Posted by 'TanglerTKM' on 19 Aug 2009 @ 22:48


| View Message Thread | Reply to this message |
TanglerTKM
Joined: September 2005
Total Posts: 1
[ View User Profile ]
Not that I pretend to actually understand any of this, but surely if (ResultantForce)=MA, and (Driving Force)=Power/velocity.....then acceleration would be entirely linked to power?

Am I right?

Message Thread:

bhp or torque  by 'KJM'   (17 Aug 2009 @ 17:31)
Re: bhp or torque  by 'davidmc'   (17 Aug 2009 @ 17:46)
Re: bhp or torque  by 'PaulMRotax'   (17 Aug 2009 @ 18:30)
Re: bhp or torque  by 'davidmc'   (17 Aug 2009 @ 19:20)
Re: bhp or torque  by 'QuickOldTimer'   (17 Aug 2009 @ 19:20)
Re: bhp or torque  by 'davidmc'   (17 Aug 2009 @ 19:22)
Re: bhp or torque  by 'KJM'   (17 Aug 2009 @ 19:38)
Re: bhp or torque  by 'QuickOldTimer'   (17 Aug 2009 @ 22:44)
Re: bhp or torque  by 'davidmc'   (18 Aug 2009 @ 0:14)
Re: bhp or torque  by 'QuickOldTimer'   (18 Aug 2009 @ 9:49)
Re: bhp or torque  by 'davidmc'   (18 Aug 2009 @ 13:05)
Re: bhp or torque  by 'QuickOldTimer'   (18 Aug 2009 @ 13:51)
Re: bhp or torque  by 'davidmc'   (18 Aug 2009 @ 15:10)
Re: bhp or torque  by 'QuickOldTimer'   (18 Aug 2009 @ 15:43)
Re: bhp or torque  by 'davidmc'   (18 Aug 2009 @ 23:41)
Re: bhp or torque  by 'QuickOldTimer'   (18 Aug 2009 @ 23:57)
No ! , the original qustion was...  by 'Chads'   (19 Aug 2009 @ 0:58)
Re: No ! , the original qustion was...  by 'QuickOldTimer'   (19 Aug 2009 @ 1:11)
Re: No ! , the original qustion was...  by 'davidmc'   (19 Aug 2009 @ 8:36)
Re: No ! , the original qustion was...  by 'QuickOldTimer'   (19 Aug 2009 @ 11:31)
Re: No ! , the original qustion was...  by 'davidmc'   (19 Aug 2009 @ 12:27)
Re: No ! , the original qustion was...  by 'Hi99'   (19 Aug 2009 @ 19:15)
Re: No ! , the original qustion was...  by 'TanglerTKM'  << You are here!
contd  by 'TanglerTKM'   (19 Aug 2009 @ 22:51)
Re: contd  by 'davidmc'   (19 Aug 2009 @ 23:57)
Re: No ! , the original qustion was...  by 'davidmc'   (19 Aug 2009 @ 23:40)
Re: No ! , the original qustion was...  by 'Hi99'   (20 Aug 2009 @ 20:13)
Davidmc is this correct?  by 'Hufggfg'   (21 Aug 2009 @ 8:33)
Re: Davidmc is this correct?  by 'davidmc'   (21 Aug 2009 @ 9:57)
Re: Davidmc is this correct?  by 'Hufggfg'   (21 Aug 2009 @ 12:02)
Re: Davidmc is this correct?  by 'davidmc'   (21 Aug 2009 @ 13:07)
KJM, your best means of altering ..  by 'Chads'   (18 Aug 2009 @ 2:13)
Re: KJM, your best means of altering ..  by 'KJM'   (19 Aug 2009 @ 9:39)
David, that doesn't make sense  by 'Booney'   (19 Aug 2009 @ 23:19)
Re: David, that doesn't make sense  by 'davidmc'   (19 Aug 2009 @ 23:53)
Maximum accel is at max torque  by 'PhilOwen'   (20 Aug 2009 @ 17:28)
Re: Maximum accel is at max torque  by 'QuickOldTimer'   (20 Aug 2009 @ 20:59)
Re: QOT  by 'John'   (20 Aug 2009 @ 22:18)
Re: QOT  by 'QuickOldTimer'   (20 Aug 2009 @ 22:26)
Re: QOT  by 'John'   (20 Aug 2009 @ 23:51)

Post a Reply:
You may post a direct reply to this message which will appear in this thread.
To post a new or unrelated message use This Form.
Reply To "Re: No ! , the original qustion was..."
Email Address :   Not Registered? Click Here to register...
Password :   Passwords are Case Sensitive!   [ Password Lookup ]
Message Title / Subject :
Message :
Options : Subscribe to this thread?   [ More Information ]

Top of Page
Notice Board Index

[ UK Karting Main Index ]


News Karts and Karting Notice Board Market Place Companies Directory Tracks Directory Events Calendar Race Results Photo Gallery Links
News Karts &
Karting
Notice
Board
Market
Place
Companies
Directory
Tracks
Directory
Events
Calendar
Race
Results
Photo
Gallery
Links

UK Karting

Copyright © 1996-2018 UK Karting
Comments, Suggestions etc. mail@karting.co.uk