UK Karting

Notice Board (General Karting)




Re: They need EVIDENCE!
Posted by 'richydehav' on 08 Aug 2009 @ 10:31


| View Message Thread | Reply to this message |
richydehav
Joined: August 2006
Total Posts: 180
[ View User Profile ]
Dan - quite agree that it does not appear logical to introduce a new regulation and then allow a variation. However, that was over two years ago so there has been plenty of opportunity for other manufacturers and parents to write to the MSA objecting to the design and requesting an explanation for the variation. Maybe this did happen but it is also quite possible that no one bothered (or not enough).
It looks as if the MSA are now taking the safety issue seriously after receiving letters. If they do find sufficient evidence to ban the Zip nosecone they would probablu y not do so until they were certain that there was a sufficient supply of `legal' ones available to meet the sudden demand.
I think there is a similar issue around the proposed new helmets - MSA want to ensure there will be enough supply and competition. I would prefer to see the new helmets as a recommendation rather than compulsory but there are parents who let their kids race in ill-fitting helmets and there have been a very few cases of helmets coming off in accidents - maybe just a case of the sensible parents having to suffer to protect the few kids from their irresponsible parents?

Message Thread:

Cadet Front Fairings Update – MSA/FIA/ZIP Meeting  by 'THR'   (05 Aug 2009 @ 18:39)
Re: Cadet Front Fairings Update – MSA/FIA/ZIP Meet  by 'chriskasch'   (05 Aug 2009 @ 18:46)
Re: Cadet Front Fairings Update – MSA/FIA/ZIP Meet  by 'John'   (05 Aug 2009 @ 19:02)
Re: Cadet Front Fairings Update – MSA/FIA/ZIP Meet  by 'THR'   (05 Aug 2009 @ 20:19)
Re: Cadet Front Fairings Update – MSA/FIA/ZIP Meet  by 'chriskasch'   (05 Aug 2009 @ 21:03)
i dont understand????? THR  by 'cosgrove78'   (05 Aug 2009 @ 21:08)
Re: i dont understand????? THR  by 'THR'   (05 Aug 2009 @ 22:20)
Re: i dont understand????? THR  by 'HC64'   (05 Aug 2009 @ 23:51)
exactly!  by 'cosgrove78'   (06 Aug 2009 @ 0:14)
Re: They need EVIDENCE!  by 'richydehav'   (06 Aug 2009 @ 11:32)
Re: They need EVIDENCE!  by 'HC64'   (06 Aug 2009 @ 12:16)
Re: They need EVIDENCE!  by 'IamdeFastese'   (06 Aug 2009 @ 12:31)
Re: They need EVIDENCE!  by 'liathach'   (06 Aug 2009 @ 12:50)
Re: They need EVIDENCE!  by 'cosgrove78'   (06 Aug 2009 @ 13:32)
Re: They need EVIDENCE!  by 'RoadRat'   (06 Aug 2009 @ 13:59)
Re: They need EVIDENCE!  by 'richydehav'   (06 Aug 2009 @ 14:19)
Re: They need EVIDENCE!  by 'dm8558'   (06 Aug 2009 @ 18:36)
Let's apply rules equaly.  by 'DCharity'   (06 Aug 2009 @ 20:17)
Re: Let's apply rules equaly.  by 'THR'   (06 Aug 2009 @ 23:33)
Re: Let's apply rules equaly.  by 'dm8558'   (07 Aug 2009 @ 7:40)
The MSA are not allowed to browse a forum?  by 'Andrewrr'   (07 Aug 2009 @ 12:11)
Re: The MSA are not allowed to browse a forum?  by 'THR'   (07 Aug 2009 @ 14:48)
Re: The MSA are not allowed to browse a forum?  by 'John'   (07 Aug 2009 @ 16:01)
There's a big diff between reading & posting..(nt)  by 'QuickOldTimer'   (07 Aug 2009 @ 17:27)
The MSA are in a no win situation!  by 'SteveC'   (09 Aug 2009 @ 14:46)
Re: The MSA are in a no win situation!  by 'RoadRat'   (09 Aug 2009 @ 15:48)
Re: richy i aggree  by 'neilw60dad'   (07 Aug 2009 @ 11:59)
Re: richy i aggree  by 'Willsdad'   (07 Aug 2009 @ 12:06)
Re: richy i aggree  by 'RoadRat'   (07 Aug 2009 @ 12:36)
The ambulance attends when a red flag is shown...  by 'Andrewrr'   (07 Aug 2009 @ 12:37)
Re: richy i aggree  by 'richydehav'   (07 Aug 2009 @ 12:37)
Re: richy i aggree  by 'RoadRat'   (07 Aug 2009 @ 12:49)
Re: richy i aggree  by 'richydehav'   (07 Aug 2009 @ 16:58)
Re: richy i aggree  by 'RoadRat'   (07 Aug 2009 @ 17:10)
When is a rule not a rule?  by 'Minisueg'   (07 Aug 2009 @ 22:19)
Re: They need EVIDENCE!  by 'DanTheK1RaceGearMan'   (07 Aug 2009 @ 23:00)
Re: They need EVIDENCE!  by 'richydehav'  << You are here!
Re: They need EVIDENCE!  by 'RoadRat'   (08 Aug 2009 @ 20:00)
Re: They need EVIDENCE!  by 'richydehav'   (09 Aug 2009 @ 9:04)
thats interesting......no red flags? hhmmmmm  by 'cosgrove78'   (09 Aug 2009 @ 11:23)
Re: thats interesting......no red flags? hhmmmmm  by 'richydehav'   (09 Aug 2009 @ 13:50)
Re: They need EVIDENCE!  by 'RoadRat'   (09 Aug 2009 @ 11:45)

Post a Reply:
You may post a direct reply to this message which will appear in this thread.
To post a new or unrelated message use This Form.
Reply To "Re: They need EVIDENCE!"
Email Address :   Not Registered? Click Here to register...
Password :   Passwords are Case Sensitive!   [ Password Lookup ]
Message Title / Subject :
Message :
Options : Subscribe to this thread?   [ More Information ]

Top of Page
Notice Board Index

[ UK Karting Main Index ]


News Karts and Karting Notice Board Market Place Companies Directory Tracks Directory Events Calendar Race Results Photo Gallery Links
News Karts &
Karting
Notice
Board
Market
Place
Companies
Directory
Tracks
Directory
Events
Calendar
Race
Results
Photo
Gallery
Links

UK Karting

Copyright © 1996-2018 UK Karting
Comments, Suggestions etc. mail@karting.co.uk