UK Karting - Notice Board (General Karting) : Re: bhp or torque

Notice Board (General Karting)

Re: bhp or torque
Posted by 'QuickOldTimer' on 18 Aug 2009 @ 13:51

| View Message Thread | Reply to this message |

QuickOldTimerJoined: April 2005
Total Posts: 1
[ View User Profile ]

No!
Let me try to explain it differently. Suppose we made an engine that had a flat torque curve. i.e. the size of the bangs were the same at all rpm. Clearly, you will accelerate faster the more frequently the bangs occur - aero & frictional losses aside, you will accelerate twice as quickly at 12000rpm than at 6000rpm.
Of course, in the real world an engine does not have a flat torque curve, and so there is a point in the rpm range where as the bangs get smaller past the torque peak and the revs increase, greatest power is developed.
The gearing, whether direct drive or gearbox, is irrelevant.

Message Thread:

bhp or torque by 'KJM' (17 Aug 2009 @ 17:31)

Re: bhp or torque by 'davidmc' (17 Aug 2009 @ 17:46)

Re: bhp or torque by 'PaulMRotax' (17 Aug 2009 @ 18:30)

Re: bhp or torque by 'davidmc' (17 Aug 2009 @ 19:20)

Re: bhp or torque by 'QuickOldTimer' (17 Aug 2009 @ 19:20)

Re: bhp or torque by 'davidmc' (17 Aug 2009 @ 19:22)

Re: bhp or torque by 'KJM' (17 Aug 2009 @ 19:38)

Re: bhp or torque by 'QuickOldTimer' (17 Aug 2009 @ 22:44)

Re: bhp or torque by 'davidmc' (18 Aug 2009 @ 0:14)

Re: bhp or torque by 'QuickOldTimer' (18 Aug 2009 @ 9:49)

Re: bhp or torque by 'davidmc' (18 Aug 2009 @ 13:05)

Re: bhp or torque by 'QuickOldTimer' << You are here!

Re: bhp or torque by 'davidmc' (18 Aug 2009 @ 15:10)

Re: bhp or torque by 'QuickOldTimer' (18 Aug 2009 @ 15:43)

Re: bhp or torque by 'davidmc' (18 Aug 2009 @ 23:41)

Re: bhp or torque by 'QuickOldTimer' (18 Aug 2009 @ 23:57)

No ! , the original qustion was... by 'Chads' (19 Aug 2009 @ 0:58)

Re: No ! , the original qustion was... by 'QuickOldTimer' (19 Aug 2009 @ 1:11)

Re: No ! , the original qustion was... by 'davidmc' (19 Aug 2009 @ 8:36)

Re: No ! , the original qustion was... by 'QuickOldTimer' (19 Aug 2009 @ 11:31)

Re: No ! , the original qustion was... by 'davidmc' (19 Aug 2009 @ 12:27)

Re: No ! , the original qustion was... by 'Hi99' (19 Aug 2009 @ 19:15)

Re: No ! , the original qustion was... by 'TanglerTKM' (19 Aug 2009 @ 22:48)

contd by 'TanglerTKM' (19 Aug 2009 @ 22:51)

Re: contd by 'davidmc' (19 Aug 2009 @ 23:57)

Re: No ! , the original qustion was... by 'davidmc' (19 Aug 2009 @ 23:40)

Re: No ! , the original qustion was... by 'Hi99' (20 Aug 2009 @ 20:13)

Davidmc is this correct? by 'Hufggfg' (21 Aug 2009 @ 8:33)

Re: Davidmc is this correct? by 'davidmc' (21 Aug 2009 @ 9:57)

Re: Davidmc is this correct? by 'Hufggfg' (21 Aug 2009 @ 12:02)

Re: Davidmc is this correct? by 'davidmc' (21 Aug 2009 @ 13:07)

KJM, your best means of altering .. by 'Chads' (18 Aug 2009 @ 2:13)

Re: KJM, your best means of altering .. by 'KJM' (19 Aug 2009 @ 9:39)

David, that doesn't make sense by 'Booney' (19 Aug 2009 @ 23:19)

Re: David, that doesn't make sense by 'davidmc' (19 Aug 2009 @ 23:53)

Maximum accel is at max torque by 'PhilOwen' (20 Aug 2009 @ 17:28)

Re: Maximum accel is at max torque by 'QuickOldTimer' (20 Aug 2009 @ 20:59)

Re: QOT by 'John' (20 Aug 2009 @ 22:18)

Re: QOT by 'QuickOldTimer' (20 Aug 2009 @ 22:26)

Re: QOT by 'John' (20 Aug 2009 @ 23:51)

Post a Reply:

You may post a direct reply to this message which will appear in this thread.
To post a new or unrelated message use This Form. Top of Page
Notice Board Index

[ UK Karting Main Index ]


News	Karts & Karting	Notice Board	Market Place	Companies Directory	Tracks Directory	Events Calendar	Race Results	Photo Gallery	Links