UK Karting

Notice Board (2-Stroke Karting)




Re: 100cc is allowed
Posted by 'deangwigan' on 19 Aug 2009 @ 13:04


| View Message Thread | Reply to this message |
deangwigan
Joined: February 2004
Total Posts: 2
[ View User Profile ]
i completely agree with darlo there. and the nothing ventured nothing gained comment is something to take onboard for sure, but it does unsettle. I am sorry if it comes across aggressive but I really feel strongly about this. I have money in the class, whether its 100's or 1000's is irrelevant, I came knocking on tkms door as a budget class for my own personal financial reasons but it could just kick me and many others out due to becoming a very expensive class and everyone would be starting out again. I need security with my racing as I cant afford to buy this and that every week in comes out like in rotax and kf (kf more so). TKM has been great cost effective racing for me and has allowed me to get into national racing. I want to continue racing but I think if the rules change and I am forced to buy a second hand cik chassis the I wont continue national racing and more than likely will stop all together, which is the last thing I want to do!

Message Thread:

2010TKM Rules  by 'Darlo'   (18 Aug 2009 @ 13:22)
Re: 2010TKM Rules  by 'MattScott'   (18 Aug 2009 @ 13:35)
just another money making scheme ?  by 'winger93'   (18 Aug 2009 @ 13:40)
Re: just another money making scheme ?  by 'deangwigan'   (18 Aug 2009 @ 13:48)
Re: just another money making scheme ?  by 'stemorton46'   (18 Aug 2009 @ 15:50)
Re: just another money making scheme ?  by 'stemorton46'   (18 Aug 2009 @ 16:02)
Re: just another money making scheme ?  by 'deangwigan'   (18 Aug 2009 @ 16:11)
Re: just another money making scheme ?  by 'stemorton46'   (18 Aug 2009 @ 16:16)
Re: just another money making scheme ?  by 'NickyW'   (18 Aug 2009 @ 16:12)
Re: just another money making scheme ?  by 'Graham S'   (18 Aug 2009 @ 16:17)
Re: just another money making scheme ?  by 'stemorton46'   (18 Aug 2009 @ 16:19)
Re: just another money making scheme ?  by 'John'   (18 Aug 2009 @ 16:27)
Re: just another money making scheme ?  by 'deangwigan'   (18 Aug 2009 @ 16:34)
eh? :s (nt)  by 'blobslosak'   (18 Aug 2009 @ 17:17)
Re: eh? :s (nt)  by 'Darlo'   (18 Aug 2009 @ 22:27)
Rotax dead at club level ?  by 'DavyBoy'   (19 Aug 2009 @ 11:59)
Re: Rotax dead at club level ?  by 'deangwigan'   (19 Aug 2009 @ 12:13)
Re: Rotax dead at club level ?  by 'KMS'   (19 Aug 2009 @ 12:26)
Re: Rotax dead at club level ?  by 'DavyBoy'   (19 Aug 2009 @ 12:33)
Re: Rotax dead at club level ?  by 'deangwigan'   (19 Aug 2009 @ 12:42)
Re: Rotax dead at club level ?  by 'DavyBoy'   (19 Aug 2009 @ 12:57)
Re: Rotax dead at club level ?  by 'deangwigan'   (19 Aug 2009 @ 13:10)
Re: Rotax dead at club level ?  by 'John'   (19 Aug 2009 @ 12:42)
Re: Rotax dead at club level ?  by 'richardmcculloch69'   (21 Aug 2009 @ 21:21)
TKM needs to be opened up  by 'DavyBoy'   (19 Aug 2009 @ 12:04)
100cc is allowed  by 'MattScott'   (19 Aug 2009 @ 12:10)
Re: 100cc is allowed  by 'DavyBoy'   (19 Aug 2009 @ 12:30)
Re: 100cc is allowed  by 'deangwigan'   (19 Aug 2009 @ 12:37)
Re: 100cc is allowed  by 'DavyBoy'   (19 Aug 2009 @ 12:53)
Re: 100cc is allowed  by 'Darlo'   (19 Aug 2009 @ 12:56)
Re: 100cc is allowed  by 'deangwigan'  << You are here!
I agree Dean  by 'Iwan'   (19 Aug 2009 @ 14:01)
Re: I agree Dean  by 'chriskasch'   (19 Aug 2009 @ 14:41)
Re: I agree Chris  by 'John'   (19 Aug 2009 @ 14:52)
Re: I agree Chris  by 'deangwigan'   (19 Aug 2009 @ 15:01)
Re: I agree Chris  by 'jkhintrepid77'   (19 Aug 2009 @ 15:39)
TKM class sustainability  by 'NickyW'   (19 Aug 2009 @ 15:20)
Re: TKM class sustainability  by 'deangwigan'   (19 Aug 2009 @ 15:26)
Re: TKM class sustainability  by 'Underdog25'   (19 Aug 2009 @ 15:41)
Do nothing ?  by 'DavyBoy'   (19 Aug 2009 @ 16:00)
Re: Do nothing ?  by 'NickyW'   (19 Aug 2009 @ 16:25)
Re: TKM class sustainability  by 'NickyW'   (19 Aug 2009 @ 15:47)
Re: TKM class sustainability  by 'deangwigan'   (19 Aug 2009 @ 15:50)
Re: I agree Dean  by 'Andrewrr'   (19 Aug 2009 @ 15:35)
Re: I agree Dean  by 'deangwigan'   (19 Aug 2009 @ 15:38)
Also Andrewrr  by 'Iwan'   (19 Aug 2009 @ 15:42)
Re: I agree Dean  by 'stemorton46'   (19 Aug 2009 @ 15:42)
Re: I agree Dean  by 'deangwigan'   (19 Aug 2009 @ 15:56)
Re: I agree Dean  by 'stemorton46'   (19 Aug 2009 @ 16:03)
Re: I agree Dean  by 'John'   (19 Aug 2009 @ 16:29)
A lot of nonsense!  by 'devilwoman25'   (19 Aug 2009 @ 17:46)
Re: A lot of nonsense!  by 'John'   (19 Aug 2009 @ 18:08)
Re: A lot of nonsense!  by 'devilwoman25'   (19 Aug 2009 @ 19:10)
Re: A lot of nonsense!  by 'KevinW'   (19 Aug 2009 @ 19:27)
@Gem  by 'DavyBoy'   (19 Aug 2009 @ 21:06)
Re: @Gem  by 'devilwoman25'   (19 Aug 2009 @ 21:49)
Re: @Gem  by 'deangwigan'   (19 Aug 2009 @ 22:03)
Re: @Gem  by 'davidmc'   (20 Aug 2009 @ 0:33)
Re: Ride Height?  by 'dth07'   (19 Aug 2009 @ 17:30)
Re: Ride Height?  by 'deangwigan'   (19 Aug 2009 @ 17:39)

Post a Reply:
You may post a direct reply to this message which will appear in this thread.
To post a new or unrelated message use This Form.
Reply To "Re: 100cc is allowed"
Email Address :   Not Registered? Click Here to register...
Password :   Passwords are Case Sensitive!   [ Password Lookup ]
Message Title / Subject :
Message :
Options : Subscribe to this thread?   [ More Information ]

Top of Page
Notice Board Index

[ UK Karting Main Index ]


News Karts and Karting Notice Board Market Place Companies Directory Tracks Directory Events Calendar Race Results Photo Gallery Links
News Karts &
Karting
Notice
Board
Market
Place
Companies
Directory
Tracks
Directory
Events
Calendar
Race
Results
Photo
Gallery
Links

UK Karting

Copyright © 1996-2018 UK Karting
Comments, Suggestions etc. mail@karting.co.uk