UK Karting

Notice Board (2-Stroke Karting)




I agree Dean
Posted by 'Iwan' on 19 Aug 2009 @ 14:01


| View Message Thread | Reply to this message |
Iwan
Joined: October 2001
Total Posts: 5
[ View User Profile ]
We need to make the class affordable and open/appealing to racers but not at the expense of the safety or quality of racing. Tbh last year in the OEKC we raced a 1992 ARC with extreme motor and although it had no lead it was running in the top 6 of a field of Rotax and Bilands so why not be allowed to run them in MSA racing? Its a perfectly good chassis with plastic bodywork. I disagree with the whole CIK chassis thing, because then you are into the arguments of different tyres etc. Keep it simple! Have a 115cc and 100cc category in the same race and you can use any TKM homologated chassis as long as it has full bumpers and plastic bodywork.

TKM is the funnest class I have ever raced in

Message Thread:

2010TKM Rules  by 'Darlo'   (18 Aug 2009 @ 13:22)
Re: 2010TKM Rules  by 'MattScott'   (18 Aug 2009 @ 13:35)
just another money making scheme ?  by 'winger93'   (18 Aug 2009 @ 13:40)
Re: just another money making scheme ?  by 'deangwigan'   (18 Aug 2009 @ 13:48)
Re: just another money making scheme ?  by 'stemorton46'   (18 Aug 2009 @ 15:50)
Re: just another money making scheme ?  by 'stemorton46'   (18 Aug 2009 @ 16:02)
Re: just another money making scheme ?  by 'deangwigan'   (18 Aug 2009 @ 16:11)
Re: just another money making scheme ?  by 'stemorton46'   (18 Aug 2009 @ 16:16)
Re: just another money making scheme ?  by 'NickyW'   (18 Aug 2009 @ 16:12)
Re: just another money making scheme ?  by 'Graham S'   (18 Aug 2009 @ 16:17)
Re: just another money making scheme ?  by 'stemorton46'   (18 Aug 2009 @ 16:19)
Re: just another money making scheme ?  by 'John'   (18 Aug 2009 @ 16:27)
Re: just another money making scheme ?  by 'deangwigan'   (18 Aug 2009 @ 16:34)
eh? :s (nt)  by 'blobslosak'   (18 Aug 2009 @ 17:17)
Re: eh? :s (nt)  by 'Darlo'   (18 Aug 2009 @ 22:27)
Rotax dead at club level ?  by 'DavyBoy'   (19 Aug 2009 @ 11:59)
Re: Rotax dead at club level ?  by 'deangwigan'   (19 Aug 2009 @ 12:13)
Re: Rotax dead at club level ?  by 'KMS'   (19 Aug 2009 @ 12:26)
Re: Rotax dead at club level ?  by 'DavyBoy'   (19 Aug 2009 @ 12:33)
Re: Rotax dead at club level ?  by 'deangwigan'   (19 Aug 2009 @ 12:42)
Re: Rotax dead at club level ?  by 'DavyBoy'   (19 Aug 2009 @ 12:57)
Re: Rotax dead at club level ?  by 'deangwigan'   (19 Aug 2009 @ 13:10)
Re: Rotax dead at club level ?  by 'John'   (19 Aug 2009 @ 12:42)
Re: Rotax dead at club level ?  by 'richardmcculloch69'   (21 Aug 2009 @ 21:21)
TKM needs to be opened up  by 'DavyBoy'   (19 Aug 2009 @ 12:04)
100cc is allowed  by 'MattScott'   (19 Aug 2009 @ 12:10)
Re: 100cc is allowed  by 'DavyBoy'   (19 Aug 2009 @ 12:30)
Re: 100cc is allowed  by 'deangwigan'   (19 Aug 2009 @ 12:37)
Re: 100cc is allowed  by 'DavyBoy'   (19 Aug 2009 @ 12:53)
Re: 100cc is allowed  by 'Darlo'   (19 Aug 2009 @ 12:56)
Re: 100cc is allowed  by 'deangwigan'   (19 Aug 2009 @ 13:04)
I agree Dean  by 'Iwan'  << You are here!
Re: I agree Dean  by 'chriskasch'   (19 Aug 2009 @ 14:41)
Re: I agree Chris  by 'John'   (19 Aug 2009 @ 14:52)
Re: I agree Chris  by 'deangwigan'   (19 Aug 2009 @ 15:01)
Re: I agree Chris  by 'jkhintrepid77'   (19 Aug 2009 @ 15:39)
TKM class sustainability  by 'NickyW'   (19 Aug 2009 @ 15:20)
Re: TKM class sustainability  by 'deangwigan'   (19 Aug 2009 @ 15:26)
Re: TKM class sustainability  by 'Underdog25'   (19 Aug 2009 @ 15:41)
Do nothing ?  by 'DavyBoy'   (19 Aug 2009 @ 16:00)
Re: Do nothing ?  by 'NickyW'   (19 Aug 2009 @ 16:25)
Re: TKM class sustainability  by 'NickyW'   (19 Aug 2009 @ 15:47)
Re: TKM class sustainability  by 'deangwigan'   (19 Aug 2009 @ 15:50)
Re: I agree Dean  by 'Andrewrr'   (19 Aug 2009 @ 15:35)
Re: I agree Dean  by 'deangwigan'   (19 Aug 2009 @ 15:38)
Also Andrewrr  by 'Iwan'   (19 Aug 2009 @ 15:42)
Re: I agree Dean  by 'stemorton46'   (19 Aug 2009 @ 15:42)
Re: I agree Dean  by 'deangwigan'   (19 Aug 2009 @ 15:56)
Re: I agree Dean  by 'stemorton46'   (19 Aug 2009 @ 16:03)
Re: I agree Dean  by 'John'   (19 Aug 2009 @ 16:29)
A lot of nonsense!  by 'devilwoman25'   (19 Aug 2009 @ 17:46)
Re: A lot of nonsense!  by 'John'   (19 Aug 2009 @ 18:08)
Re: A lot of nonsense!  by 'devilwoman25'   (19 Aug 2009 @ 19:10)
Re: A lot of nonsense!  by 'KevinW'   (19 Aug 2009 @ 19:27)
@Gem  by 'DavyBoy'   (19 Aug 2009 @ 21:06)
Re: @Gem  by 'devilwoman25'   (19 Aug 2009 @ 21:49)
Re: @Gem  by 'deangwigan'   (19 Aug 2009 @ 22:03)
Re: @Gem  by 'davidmc'   (20 Aug 2009 @ 0:33)
Re: Ride Height?  by 'dth07'   (19 Aug 2009 @ 17:30)
Re: Ride Height?  by 'deangwigan'   (19 Aug 2009 @ 17:39)

Post a Reply:
You may post a direct reply to this message which will appear in this thread.
To post a new or unrelated message use This Form.
Reply To "Re: I agree Dean"
Email Address :   Not Registered? Click Here to register...
Password :   Passwords are Case Sensitive!   [ Password Lookup ]
Message Title / Subject :
Message :
Options : Subscribe to this thread?   [ More Information ]

Top of Page
Notice Board Index

[ UK Karting Main Index ]


News Karts and Karting Notice Board Market Place Companies Directory Tracks Directory Events Calendar Race Results Photo Gallery Links
News Karts &
Karting
Notice
Board
Market
Place
Companies
Directory
Tracks
Directory
Events
Calendar
Race
Results
Photo
Gallery
Links

UK Karting

Copyright © 1996-2018 UK Karting
Comments, Suggestions etc. mail@karting.co.uk