|
I understand what you are suggesting, as an addition to the overall coverage, but do you not think there would be a huge number of postings criticising the picture quality? As I have suggested, the idea is definitely worth pursuing at some point, and if you had a way of presenting it then get in touch. Why not look into it and get back to me with some costings. Even doing it as you suggest, you might be surprised at the cost. 3-5 video senders for the the images, camera to view the screen, bandwidth etc. not to mention live commentary. Another option as you have talked about it.... easier to do JUST a live commentary at first? Now that could probably be done at a suitable budget perhaps.
|
|