UK Karting

Notice Board (2-Stroke Karting)




Re: I quite agree that it is not fit for purpose.
Posted by 'Jole' on 29 Sep 2010 @ 19:38


| View Message Thread | Reply to this message |
Jole
Joined: November 2007
Total Posts: 1
[ View User Profile ]
We have put a couple of posts on on another thread on a similar topic ie Storm karts cracking.

We have been trying to pursue this now for a couple of months.Dont want to go into too much detail but we dont want another Storm.We agree with others here and one person has actually stated that they also feel that there is no point in taking another Storm chassis.We totally agree with this.Everyone has a budget and no matter what the size of that budget is,how many of us can afford to write off around £1500? Whether you can afford to or not,you shouldn't have to.

Unfortunately,our situation is now dragging on a bit and we wish everyone who is pursuing this the very best of luck.It would perhaps be beneficial to all Storm owners if we could do our best to support the chap who is obviously trying to do something here and hope he gets the reaction he deserves.
It appears that someone feels that we are being unreasonable in handing the kart back and requesting a refund.It seems as though they feel that we simply did not like the kart and for that reason wanted our money back.This is definitely not the case.We are not the only ones in this situation and given the number of recent comments on here re the Storm,we are surprised that they feel this way.Perhaps they can see the trend now and it may be more productive if they had spoken to us first.
Best of luck guys and it might be an idea for some of you to take advice here.Dont forget,you can pursue this for a very minimal cost and you definitely have strong evidence from many sources now to support your case.
Cheers

Message Thread:

Intrepid Storm (Cracking issues)  by 'PaulGarnerTKM'   (29 Sep 2010 @ 12:48)
Contact him direct....  by 'ScoobyScene'   (29 Sep 2010 @ 13:00)
I wonder what you expected from a cheapo?  by 'AlfieMoon'   (29 Sep 2010 @ 14:58)
Re: I wonder what you expected from a cheapo?  by 'PaulGarnerTKM'   (29 Sep 2010 @ 15:07)
I quite agree that it is not fit for purpose.  by 'AlfieMoon'   (29 Sep 2010 @ 15:53)
Re: I quite agree that it is not fit for purpose.  by 'ScoobyScene'   (29 Sep 2010 @ 16:12)
Re: I quite agree that it is not fit for purpose.  by 'drewdt3'   (29 Sep 2010 @ 16:21)
Re: I quite agree that it is not fit for purpose.  by 'kartcollector'   (29 Sep 2010 @ 17:30)
Re: I quite agree that it is not fit for purpose.  by 'Ballhatchet'   (29 Sep 2010 @ 18:19)
Re: I quite agree that it is not fit for purpose.  by 'drewdt3'   (29 Sep 2010 @ 18:34)
Re: I quite agree that it is not fit for purpose.  by 'Ballhatchet'   (29 Sep 2010 @ 18:46)
Re: I quite agree that it is not fit for purpose.  by 'Jole'  << You are here!
Re: I quite agree that it is not fit for purpose.  by 'philharrison'   (29 Sep 2010 @ 22:58)
Re: I quite agree that it is not fit for purpose.  by 'kartcollector'   (30 Sep 2010 @ 7:25)
Re: I quite agree that it is not fit for purpose.  by 'Jole'   (30 Sep 2010 @ 8:21)
Re: I quite agree that it is not fit for purpose.  by 'philharrison'   (30 Sep 2010 @ 14:10)
Not good enough!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!  by 'AlfieMoon'   (30 Sep 2010 @ 15:16)
Re: Not good enough!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!  by 'philharrison'   (30 Sep 2010 @ 16:51)
Re: Not good enough!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!  by 'Invader'   (30 Sep 2010 @ 17:06)
Re: Not good enough!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!  by 'richydehav'   (30 Sep 2010 @ 17:03)
Re: Not good enough!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!  by 'Ballhatchet'   (30 Sep 2010 @ 17:14)
Re: Not good enough!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!  by 'Jole'   (30 Sep 2010 @ 19:10)
Re: Not good enough!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!  by 'Ballhatchet'   (30 Sep 2010 @ 21:46)
storm issues  by 'TeamOrange'   (30 Sep 2010 @ 21:55)
Re: storm issues  by 'Ballhatchet'   (30 Sep 2010 @ 23:17)
Re: storm issues  by 'drewdt3'   (01 Oct 2010 @ 9:50)
Re: storm issues  by 'gaz47'   (01 Oct 2010 @ 12:37)
Re: storm issues  by 'drewdt3'   (01 Oct 2010 @ 15:23)
Re: storm issues  by 'lbsf1'   (01 Oct 2010 @ 16:09)
Re: storm issues  by 'drewdt3'   (01 Oct 2010 @ 16:47)
That is not a crack.  by 'AlfieMoon'   (01 Oct 2010 @ 18:02)
Re: storm issues  by 'DavyBoy'   (01 Oct 2010 @ 18:21)
Re: storm issues  by 'Liam'   (02 Oct 2010 @ 1:15)
Re: storm issues  by 'iant'   (07 Oct 2010 @ 16:16)
Re: Intrepid Storm (Cracking issues)  by 'jaiandrews'   (05 Oct 2010 @ 18:58)
Re: Intrepid Storm (Cracking issues)  by 'GR2'   (07 Oct 2010 @ 9:57)

Post a Reply:
You may post a direct reply to this message which will appear in this thread.
To post a new or unrelated message use This Form.
Reply To "Re: I quite agree that it is not fit for purpose."
Email Address :   Not Registered? Click Here to register...
Password :   Passwords are Case Sensitive!   [ Password Lookup ]
Message Title / Subject :
Message :
Options : Subscribe to this thread?   [ More Information ]

Top of Page
Notice Board Index

[ UK Karting Main Index ]


News Karts and Karting Notice Board Market Place Companies Directory Tracks Directory Events Calendar Race Results Photo Gallery Links
News Karts &
Karting
Notice
Board
Market
Place
Companies
Directory
Tracks
Directory
Events
Calendar
Race
Results
Photo
Gallery
Links

UK Karting

Copyright © 1996-2018 UK Karting
Comments, Suggestions etc. mail@karting.co.uk