"but at the same time increased due to the reduced differential effect"
Could you please explain this? I can understand what you are saying regarding the camber, but I'm not sure I'm getting what the above statement is saying.
From what I can gather from your post, you would seem to advocate a stiff chassis with low caster angles and just enough axle flex to allow the outside rear to remain at 0 deg camber when cornering. The lower caster angles would probably also help maintain more sensible front end geometry when turning and reduce driver fatigue, although rear grip would become closely coupled to steering lock.
Dave
|
|