UK Karting - Notice Board (Chat) : Re: Singers? No reply? Quelle surprise!

Notice Board (Chat)

Re: Singers? No reply? Quelle surprise!
Posted by 'itpro' on 28 Oct 2008 @ 18:14

| View Message Thread | Reply to this message |

itproJoined: August 2001
Total Posts: 6
[ View User Profile ]

Sadly, you haven't replied to this....... and I was SO looking forward to explaining the 'one over r squared' rule to you!

Anybody ELSE who has been reading it might like to know that the influence on the 'Local GIANT' of Jupiter is all but UNMEASURABLE on the Earth!

The Moon can raise the sea level (i.e., tides) by up to FIFTY FIVE FEET! Jupiter might raise the sea by 0.1 millimetre!

The point is the WEAKENING of gravity decreases STAGGERINGLY quickly with increasing distance. By the time you get to Jupiter, you'd need somthing MILLIONS of times bigger than Jupiter to affect the sea by as much as the Moon does.

Here's a page that may help you:-

http://hyperphysics.phy-astr.gsu.edu/Hbase/tide.html

Taking that NEXT step........ not even the utterly MINDBLOWINGLY, HUMUNGOUS, completely UNIMAGINABLE mass of our OWN Galaxy's BLACK HOLE (at the centre of our Galaxy) has a MEASURABLE effect on our tides.

....... and so..... to make the school boy H*O*W*L*E*R of suggesting that a galaxy some TWO BILLION LIGHT YEARS (TWO THOUSAND MILLION times further than light can travel in a whole YEAR) away might have some effect........ might JUST show you how FAR Singers is out of his D*E*P*T*H!

Ian

Message Thread:

dark matter by 'singers' (23 Oct 2008 @ 16:14)

Re: dark matter by 'itpro' (23 Oct 2008 @ 18:17)

Re: dark matter by 'kudos' (24 Oct 2008 @ 1:21)

Re: dark matter by 'singers' (24 Oct 2008 @ 9:05)

Re: dark matter by 'itpro' (24 Oct 2008 @ 10:55)

Victor Bouqet! ha ha by 'singers' (24 Oct 2008 @ 14:50)

Dark Matter by 'Gillard77' (24 Oct 2008 @ 15:03)

Re: Victor Bouqet! ha ha by 'itpro' (24 Oct 2008 @ 16:58)

Re: Victor Bouqet! blinkers! ha ha ha ha ha ha by 'singers' (24 Oct 2008 @ 17:28)

Re: Victor Bouqet! blinkers! ha ha ha ha ha ha by 'itpro' (24 Oct 2008 @ 17:49)

Alf Garnett, lol by 'singers' (25 Oct 2008 @ 10:14)

Singers by 'itpro' (27 Oct 2008 @ 10:36)

Re: Singers? No reply? Quelle surprise! by 'itpro' << You are here!

Re: Singers? No reply? Quelle surprise! by 'RoadRat' (28 Oct 2008 @ 19:03)

Re: Singers? No reply? Quelle surprise! by 'itpro' (28 Oct 2008 @ 20:12)

.... continued by 'itpro' (28 Oct 2008 @ 20:20)

Re: .... continued by 'RoadRat' (28 Oct 2008 @ 20:55)

Road Rat by 'itpro' (29 Oct 2008 @ 0:14)

why bother! falls on deaf ears! by 'singers' (31 Oct 2008 @ 16:28)

As you'd expect form Singers..... by 'itpro' (31 Oct 2008 @ 18:13)

same OLD same OLD by 'singers' (31 Oct 2008 @ 22:16)

Re: same OLD same OLD by 'itpro' (02 Nov 2008 @ 12:31)

you don't half took rot by 'singers' (31 Oct 2008 @ 22:35)

Re: you don't half took rot by 'itpro' (02 Nov 2008 @ 12:37)

SUN SUN SUN SUN!!!! well done Lewis by 'singers' (03 Nov 2008 @ 9:04)

Re: SUN SUN SUN SUN!!!! well done Lewis by 'itpro' (03 Nov 2008 @ 11:22)

you know I'm right, here's your proof by 'singers' (03 Nov 2008 @ 19:47)

Re: you know I'm right, here's your proof by 'itpro' (04 Nov 2008 @ 1:37)

Ha ha ha! Thats a good'un! by 'vic' (04 Nov 2008 @ 8:57)

Oh.... Vic, you ain't seen the NEXT one! by 'itpro' (04 Nov 2008 @ 10:39)

you're BOTH wrong again! by 'singers' (04 Nov 2008 @ 12:03)

Re: you're BOTH wrong again! by 'itpro' (04 Nov 2008 @ 17:48)

Singers....... by 'vic' (24 Oct 2008 @ 17:57)

Re: Singers....... by 'brinjono' (24 Oct 2008 @ 19:02)

nope! by 'singers' (25 Oct 2008 @ 10:20)

Re: nope! by 'vic' (25 Oct 2008 @ 13:22)

Don't forget Alf Garnett by 'RoadRat' (24 Oct 2008 @ 19:51)

Re: Don't forget Alf Garnett by 'singers' (25 Oct 2008 @ 10:53)

Re: Don't forget Alf Garnett by 'itpro' (27 Oct 2008 @ 10:39)

Itpro & Singers by 'Canceric' (02 Nov 2008 @ 1:30)

Re: Itpro & Singers by 'itpro' (02 Nov 2008 @ 12:41)

Re: Itpro & Singers by 'Canceric' (02 Nov 2008 @ 15:25)

Re: Itpro & Singers by 'itpro' (03 Nov 2008 @ 11:57)

canceric by 'singers' (03 Nov 2008 @ 19:55)

Re: canceric by 'itpro' (04 Nov 2008 @ 1:47)

Re: canceric by 'mobilechicane' (04 Nov 2008 @ 6:55)

mobilechicane by 'singers' (04 Nov 2008 @ 12:21)

Re: mobilechicane by 'itpro' (04 Nov 2008 @ 17:50)

singers.... by 'vic' (04 Nov 2008 @ 20:40)

Post a Reply:

You may post a direct reply to this message which will appear in this thread.
To post a new or unrelated message use This Form. Top of Page
Notice Board Index

[ UK Karting Main Index ]


News	Karts & Karting	Notice Board	Market Place	Companies Directory	Tracks Directory	Events Calendar	Race Results	Photo Gallery	Links