UK Karting

Notice Board (Chat)




Re: it was this guy!
Posted by 'DanXP1' on 28 Nov 2008 @ 19:00


| View Message Thread | Reply to this message |
DanXP1
Joined: January 2007
Total Posts: 1
[ View User Profile ]
No one ever claimed the tree ring data was perfectly accurate and on it own was absolute proof. Many other scientists have used a multitude of markers, other than tree rings, that produce graphs that consistently match up with the ‘hockey stick’. When data collected using a variety of methods by scientists in differing fields consistently shows the same pattern you have to draw the same conclusion.

Just because a small amount of data falls outside the range of the majority of data, that does not disprove the ‘hockey stick’ and this is a normal occurrence in the scientific method. The latching onto a single piece of data that does not fit the vast majority of data is what creationists use to disprove evolution. Ignoring all of the most likely explanations and focusing on the least probable scenario is what extraterrestrial UFO believers do.

These people use the ‘reverse scientific method, they determine what they want to happen, throw out all the data that doesn't fit their conclusion, and then hail their findings as the only possible conclusion.

Message Thread:

becuase the debate is NOT over  by 'singers'   (27 Nov 2008 @ 16:40)
leased resistence?  by 'alanrr'   (27 Nov 2008 @ 18:00)
Re: leased resistence? Tee hee!  by 'itpro'   (27 Nov 2008 @ 20:23)
Re: leased resistence? Tee hee!  by 'vic'   (28 Nov 2008 @ 7:38)
can i get a rewind  by 'singers'   (28 Nov 2008 @ 9:23)
this old nugget again.....  by 'Tmoon'   (28 Nov 2008 @ 12:54)
it was this guy!  by 'singers'   (28 Nov 2008 @ 15:15)
oh yeh and where's global warming this year?  by 'singers'   (28 Nov 2008 @ 16:01)
Re: oh yeh and where's global warming this year?  by 'itpro'   (28 Nov 2008 @ 17:12)
As requested by Ian ..a reply from Australia  by 'Chad'   (01 Dec 2008 @ 2:57)
Re: As requested by Ian ..a reply from Australia  by 'itpro'   (01 Dec 2008 @ 10:34)
Re: oh yeh and where's global warming this year?  by 'Tmoon'   (28 Nov 2008 @ 17:52)
Re: it was this guy!  by 'DanXP1'  << You are here!
Dan  by 'Chad'   (01 Dec 2008 @ 2:46)
things are changing, rapidly  by 'singers'   (01 Dec 2008 @ 11:29)
read this  by 'singers'   (01 Dec 2008 @ 11:30)
simple conclusions ..  by 'Chad'   (01 Dec 2008 @ 22:35)
Re: simple conclusions ..  by 'itpro'   (02 Dec 2008 @ 16:42)
A serious question for the climate change cynics  by 'QuickOldTimer'   (02 Dec 2008 @ 18:42)
Re: A serious question for the climate change cyni  by 'DanXP1'   (02 Dec 2008 @ 18:59)
Thames forecast to freeze this winter!!!!!  by 'RoadRat'   (02 Dec 2008 @ 19:22)
Re: Thames forecast to freeze this winter!!!!!  by 'itpro'   (02 Dec 2008 @ 22:12)
Re: Thames forecast to freeze this winter!!!!!  by 'davidmc'   (02 Dec 2008 @ 22:19)
Re: Thames forecast to freeze this winter!!!!!  by 'itpro'   (02 Dec 2008 @ 22:42)
Re: Thames forecast to freeze this winter!!!!!  by 'davidmc'   (02 Dec 2008 @ 22:48)
Re: Thames forecast to freeze this winter!!!!!  by 'itpro'   (03 Dec 2008 @ 0:09)
Re: Thames forecast to freeze this winter!!!!!  by 'davidmc'   (03 Dec 2008 @ 0:57)
Re: Thames forecast to freeze this winter!!!!!  by 'itpro'   (03 Dec 2008 @ 10:09)
Re: Thames forecast to freeze this winter!!!!!  by 'davidmc'   (03 Dec 2008 @ 11:45)
Re: Thames forecast to freeze this winter!!!!!  by 'itpro'   (03 Dec 2008 @ 12:50)
Re: Thames forecast to freeze this winter!!!!!  by 'RoadRat'   (03 Dec 2008 @ 10:55)
Re: Thames forecast to freeze this winter!!!!!  by 'itpro'   (03 Dec 2008 @ 13:18)
First, hell can freeze this winter!!!!!  by 'RoadRat'   (03 Dec 2008 @ 19:49)
Re: First, hell can freeze this winter!!!!!  by 'itpro'   (04 Dec 2008 @ 10:54)
Re: First, hell can freeze this winter!!!!!  by 'davidmc'   (04 Dec 2008 @ 11:50)
Re: First, hell can freeze this winter!!!!!  by 'itpro'   (04 Dec 2008 @ 16:55)
Re: First, hell can freeze this winter!!!!!  by 'RoadRat'   (04 Dec 2008 @ 19:03)
David.... I hope you are reading his replies!  by 'itpro'   (04 Dec 2008 @ 21:17)
Re: Thames forecast to freeze this winter!!!!!  by 'RoadRat'   (03 Dec 2008 @ 11:18)
Re: Thames forecast to freeze this winter!!!!!  by 'itpro'   (03 Dec 2008 @ 13:30)
Re: A serious question for the climate change cyni  by 'RoadRat'   (02 Dec 2008 @ 19:29)
Re: A serious question for the climate change cyni  by 'DanXP1'   (02 Dec 2008 @ 20:04)
Re: A serious question for the climate change cyni  by 'davidmc'   (02 Dec 2008 @ 22:16)
Re: A serious question for the climate change cyni  by 'itpro'   (02 Dec 2008 @ 22:31)
Re: A serious question for the climate change cyni  by 'davidmc'   (02 Dec 2008 @ 23:28)
Re: A serious question for the climate change cyni  by 'itpro'   (03 Dec 2008 @ 0:21)
Re: A serious question for the climate change cyni  by 'davidmc'   (03 Dec 2008 @ 0:47)
Re: A serious question for the climate change cyni  by 'itpro'   (03 Dec 2008 @ 10:06)
Re: A serious question for the climate change cyni  by 'davidmc'   (03 Dec 2008 @ 11:49)
Re: A serious question for the climate change cyni  by 'itpro'   (03 Dec 2008 @ 13:28)
Re: A serious question for the climate change cyni  by 'davidmc'   (03 Dec 2008 @ 17:20)
Re: A serious question for the climate change cyni  by 'itpro'   (03 Dec 2008 @ 17:49)
Re: A serious question for the climate change cyni  by 'davidmc'   (03 Dec 2008 @ 18:25)
Re: A serious question for the climate change cyni  by 'RoadRat'   (03 Dec 2008 @ 19:25)
Re: A serious question for the climate change cyni  by 'davidmc'   (03 Dec 2008 @ 19:37)
Re: A serious question for the climate change cyni  by 'RoadRat'   (03 Dec 2008 @ 19:57)
Re: A serious question for the climate change cyni  by 'itpro'   (04 Dec 2008 @ 11:04)
Re: A serious question for the climate change cyni  by 'davidmc'   (04 Dec 2008 @ 12:02)
Re: A serious question for the climate change cyni  by 'itpro'   (04 Dec 2008 @ 17:34)
Stunned again!  by 'itpro'   (02 Dec 2008 @ 22:18)
Re: Stunned again!  by 'RoadRat'   (03 Dec 2008 @ 11:07)
Re: Stunned again!  by 'itpro'   (03 Dec 2008 @ 13:22)
QOT.....  by 'Tmoon'   (03 Dec 2008 @ 11:59)
re: qot.....  by 'DanXP1'   (03 Dec 2008 @ 13:35)
re: qot.....  by 'davidmc'   (03 Dec 2008 @ 17:28)
Dan  by 'itpro'   (03 Dec 2008 @ 17:59)
Tax  by 'Tmoon'   (04 Dec 2008 @ 10:57)
Re: Tax  by 'itpro'   (04 Dec 2008 @ 11:16)
Re: Tax  by 'davidmc'   (04 Dec 2008 @ 12:07)
Re: Tax  by 'Tmoon'   (04 Dec 2008 @ 14:27)
Re: Tax  by 'itpro'   (04 Dec 2008 @ 16:57)
Again  by 'Canceric'   (02 Dec 2008 @ 22:03)
Re: Again  by 'DanXP1'   (03 Dec 2008 @ 13:52)
Re: Again  by 'Tmoon'   (03 Dec 2008 @ 16:30)
Re: Again  by 'RoadRat'   (03 Dec 2008 @ 19:33)
Re: Again  by 'itpro'   (04 Dec 2008 @ 11:19)
Re: Again  by 'RoadRat'   (04 Dec 2008 @ 19:07)

Post a Reply:
You may post a direct reply to this message which will appear in this thread.
To post a new or unrelated message use This Form.
Reply To "Re: it was this guy!"
Email Address :   Not Registered? Click Here to register...
Password :   Passwords are Case Sensitive!   [ Password Lookup ]
Message Title / Subject :
Message :
Options : Subscribe to this thread?   [ More Information ]

Top of Page
Notice Board Index

[ UK Karting Main Index ]


News Karts and Karting Notice Board Market Place Companies Directory Tracks Directory Events Calendar Race Results Photo Gallery Links
News Karts &
Karting
Notice
Board
Market
Place
Companies
Directory
Tracks
Directory
Events
Calendar
Race
Results
Photo
Gallery
Links

UK Karting

Copyright © 1996-2018 UK Karting
Comments, Suggestions etc. mail@karting.co.uk