UK Karting - Notice Board (Chat) : Re: Ban all wings and aero aids..

Notice Board (Chat)

Re: Ban all wings and aero aids..
Posted by 'QuickOldTimer' on 15 Mar 2010 @ 12:22

| View Message Thread | Reply to this message |

QuickOldTimerJoined: April 2005
Total Posts: 1
[ View User Profile ]

F1 has, in reality, always been "boring" to watch for the non-enthusiast. The cars are timed in practice, and lined up for the race with the fastest at the front. This is not a recipe for entertainment! But I certainly do not think that it should be changed. The fastest should win, just as in horse racing, athletics, cycling etc. The problem that we have today, compared with "the good old days", is that watching a car on its own going around is no longer exciting to watch. The key thing that needs to be done to F1 to improve the spectacle is to get rid of traction control. The engine management simulated traction control that they currently are allowed makes it to easy for the drivers. The rules should be changed to state that the power that an engine delivers to the rear wheels should be solely a function of engine rpm and throttle opening. I am also highly suspicious that they are using some form of ABS - there would be far more wheel locking going on if it was just down to the drivers. Get rid of all these driver aids, including power steering, then the fun will start!

Message Thread:

For the F1 Critics..... by 'Tmoon' (15 Mar 2010 @ 11:10)

Re: For the F1 Critics..... by 'Traxtar' (15 Mar 2010 @ 11:20)

Ban all wings and aero aids.. by 'Chads' (15 Mar 2010 @ 11:57)

Re: Ban all wings and aero aids.. by 'QuickOldTimer' << You are here!

Re: Traction control by 'Ballhatchet' (15 Mar 2010 @ 16:38)

Re: Traction control by 'QuickOldTimer' (15 Mar 2010 @ 18:51)

Re: Traction control by 'Ballhatchet' (15 Mar 2010 @ 19:27)

Re: Traction control by 'QuickOldTimer' (15 Mar 2010 @ 20:53)

Re: Traction control by 'Chads' (15 Mar 2010 @ 22:10)

Re: Traction control by 'Bod' (15 Mar 2010 @ 22:33)

Re: Traction control by 'Ballhatchet' (15 Mar 2010 @ 23:25)

If advertising space is essential... by 'Chads' (15 Mar 2010 @ 23:30)

Re: If advertising space is essential... by 'Ballhatchet' (15 Mar 2010 @ 23:54)

I think you have swollowed the line... by 'Chads' (16 Mar 2010 @ 0:15)

Re: I think you have swollowed the line... by 'Ballhatchet' (16 Mar 2010 @ 0:48)

Yes, adds are important, but... by 'Chads' (16 Mar 2010 @ 1:07)

think of it this way ... by 'Chads' (16 Mar 2010 @ 1:55)

Re: think of it this way ... by 'Ballhatchet' (16 Mar 2010 @ 9:30)

Re: Ban all wings and aero aids.. by 'richpudd2003' (15 Mar 2010 @ 12:32)

Re: Ban all wings and aero aids.. by 'bertie77' (15 Mar 2010 @ 13:13)

Re: Ban all wings and aero aids.. by 'rogergreen' (15 Mar 2010 @ 22:48)

We couldn't simply 'ban wings' safely by 'itpro' (16 Mar 2010 @ 10:13)

Re: We couldn't simply 'ban wings' safely by 'DavyBoy' (16 Mar 2010 @ 10:49)

Re: We couldn't simply 'ban wings' safely by 'itpro' (16 Mar 2010 @ 11:09)

Re: We couldn't simply 'ban wings' safely by 'DavyBoy' (16 Mar 2010 @ 11:18)

Re: We couldn't simply 'ban wings' safely by 'itpro' (16 Mar 2010 @ 11:23)

Re: We couldn't simply 'ban wings' safely by 'bertie77' (16 Mar 2010 @ 11:44)

Re: We couldn't simply 'ban wings' safely by 'DavyBoy' (16 Mar 2010 @ 11:47)

Re: We couldn't simply 'ban wings' safely by 'itpro' (16 Mar 2010 @ 11:56)

Re: We couldn't simply 'ban wings' safely by 'DavyBoy' (16 Mar 2010 @ 12:10)

Re: We couldn't simply 'ban wings' safely by 'itpro' (16 Mar 2010 @ 13:09)

Re: We couldn't simply 'ban wings' safely by 'Doink' (16 Mar 2010 @ 13:38)

Re: We couldn't simply 'ban wings' safely by 'DavyBoy' (16 Mar 2010 @ 13:57)

Re: We couldn't simply 'ban wings' safely by 'Doink' (16 Mar 2010 @ 12:03)

I got it!!!!!!! by 'Tmoon' (16 Mar 2010 @ 12:32)

Re: I got it!!!!!!! by 'bertie77' (16 Mar 2010 @ 12:44)

Re: We couldn't simply 'ban wings' safely by 'bertie77' (16 Mar 2010 @ 12:39)

Ban them but red bull would be OK by 'Shanny' (16 Mar 2010 @ 17:17)

Re: We couldn't simply 'ban wings' safely by 'davidmc' (16 Mar 2010 @ 17:27)

Re: We couldn't simply 'ban wings' safely by 'richpudd2003' (16 Mar 2010 @ 20:05)

Re: We couldn't simply 'ban wings' safely by 'itpro' (16 Mar 2010 @ 20:16)

Re: We couldn't simply 'ban wings' safely by 'richpudd2003' (16 Mar 2010 @ 20:56)

Re: We couldn't simply 'ban wings' safely by 'itpro' (16 Mar 2010 @ 20:11)

300 mph ..!! ..Rubbish ! by 'Chads' (16 Mar 2010 @ 23:11)

Re: 300 mph ..!! ..Rubbish !...... NOT! by 'itpro' (17 Mar 2010 @ 13:55)

Re: 300 mph ..!! ..Rubbish !...... NOT! by 'QuickOldTimer' (17 Mar 2010 @ 15:12)

Re: 300 mph ..!! ..Rubbish !...... NOT! by 'itpro' (18 Mar 2010 @ 12:22)

Re: 300 mph ..!! ..Rubbish !...... NOT! by 'QuickOldTimer' (18 Mar 2010 @ 12:52)

Re: 300 mph ..!! ..Rubbish !...... NOT! by 'itpro' (18 Mar 2010 @ 12:59)

So Ian, do you still feel the wings could not .. by 'Chads' (19 Mar 2010 @ 8:02)

Re: So Ian, do you still feel the wings could not by 'jnrblue91' (19 Mar 2010 @ 9:37)

Re: So Ian, do you still feel the wings could not by 'itpro' (22 Mar 2010 @ 16:39)

Re: So Ian, do you still feel the wings could not by 'davidmc' (22 Mar 2010 @ 17:44)

Re: So Ian, do you still feel the wings could not by 'itpro' (22 Mar 2010 @ 18:47)

Re: So Ian, do you still feel the wings could not by 'davidmc' (22 Mar 2010 @ 18:59)

Re: So Ian, do you still feel the wings could not by 'itpro' (23 Mar 2010 @ 2:42)

Post a Reply:

You may post a direct reply to this message which will appear in this thread.
To post a new or unrelated message use This Form. Top of Page
Notice Board Index

[ UK Karting Main Index ]


News	Karts & Karting	Notice Board	Market Place	Companies Directory	Tracks Directory	Events Calendar	Race Results	Photo Gallery	Links