UK Karting

Notice Board (Chat)




Re: Its not quite the same Ian
Posted by 'DavyBoy' on 12 Aug 2010 @ 17:53


| View Message Thread | Reply to this message |
DavyBoy
Joined: July 2005
Total Posts: 1
[ View User Profile ]
One Gatso [together with the infrastructure to administer it] will catch a vehicle exceeding the speed over a distance of 50* metres. How many Gatsos would it require to fully cover the road network of this country ? A similar situation holds true for SPECS. Tampering with a Gatso or the SPECS system is generally not the kind of thing most law abiding citizens would do but its perfectly possible for those minded to do so, as is perverting most other forms of camera based enforcement.

Similarly, disabling a speed governor would be possible but difficult and risky. As before, its not the kind of thing most law abiding citizens would consider doing... but like other forms of criminal behaviour, there are plenty who would have no qualms about doing it.

By the way Ian, how good are you at disabling the vehicle immobilizer on a modern car ? How about hacking bank accounts ?

* I'm not sure of the precise distance a Gasto covers, but its of that order.

Message Thread:

We'll see.......  by 'itpro'   (10 Aug 2010 @ 17:53)
Re: We'll see.......  by 'Aquila'   (10 Aug 2010 @ 18:43)
Re: We'll see.......  by 'itpro'   (10 Aug 2010 @ 20:06)
Re: We'll see.......  by 'Aquila'   (10 Aug 2010 @ 20:45)
Re: We'll see.......  by 'itpro'   (10 Aug 2010 @ 21:12)
Re: We'll see.......  by 'Aquila'   (10 Aug 2010 @ 21:21)
Its 2010  by 'DavyBoy'   (10 Aug 2010 @ 21:29)
Re: Its 2010  by 'Aquila'   (10 Aug 2010 @ 21:36)
Re: Its 2010  by 'itpro'   (10 Aug 2010 @ 22:03)
The oddest thing is.  by 'AlfieMoon'   (10 Aug 2010 @ 22:06)
Re: The oddest thing is.  by 'itpro'   (11 Aug 2010 @ 1:10)
Re: The oddest thing is.  by 'AlfieMoon'   (11 Aug 2010 @ 13:51)
Re: The oddest thing is.  by 'itpro'   (11 Aug 2010 @ 16:22)
Re: Its 2010.... Davy  by 'itpro'   (10 Aug 2010 @ 21:59)
Re: Its 2010.... Davy  by 'DavyBoy'   (11 Aug 2010 @ 14:17)
Re: Its 2010.... Davy  by 'Traxtar'   (11 Aug 2010 @ 15:10)
Re: Its 2010.... Davy  by 'itpro'   (11 Aug 2010 @ 16:29)
Re: Its 2010.... Davy  by 'DavyBoy'   (11 Aug 2010 @ 18:42)
Re: Its 2010.... Davy  by 'RoadRat'   (11 Aug 2010 @ 18:53)
Re: Its 2010.... RoadRat  by 'itpro'   (11 Aug 2010 @ 22:04)
Re: Its 2010.... Davy  by 'itpro'   (11 Aug 2010 @ 21:58)
Its not quite the same Ian  by 'DavyBoy'   (12 Aug 2010 @ 8:47)
Re: Its not quite the same Ian  by 'itpro'   (12 Aug 2010 @ 10:13)
Re: Its not quite the same Ian  by 'DavyBoy'   (12 Aug 2010 @ 11:46)
Re: Its not quite the same Ian  by 'itpro'   (12 Aug 2010 @ 13:33)
Re: Its not quite the same Ian  by 'DavyBoy'   (12 Aug 2010 @ 16:17)
Re: Its not quite the same Ian  by 'itpro'   (12 Aug 2010 @ 16:31)
Re: Its not quite the same Ian  by 'DavyBoy'  << You are here!
Re: Its not quite the same Ian  by 'itpro'   (13 Aug 2010 @ 10:42)
Re: Its not quite the same Ian  by 'davidmc'   (13 Aug 2010 @ 14:06)
Of COURSE I support the development of limiters  by 'itpro'   (13 Aug 2010 @ 14:53)
Re: Its not quite the same Ian  by 'davidmc'   (12 Aug 2010 @ 18:27)
Ok, you two!  by 'itpro'   (13 Aug 2010 @ 10:55)
Re: Ok, you two!  by 'DavyBoy'   (13 Aug 2010 @ 11:29)
Re: Ok, you two! Hang on....  by 'itpro'   (13 Aug 2010 @ 11:42)
Re: Ok, you two! Hang on....  by 'DavyBoy'   (13 Aug 2010 @ 13:56)
Re: Ok, you two! Hang on....  by 'itpro'   (13 Aug 2010 @ 14:43)
Re: Ok, you two! Hang on....  by 'DavyBoy'   (13 Aug 2010 @ 15:13)
Re: Ok, you two! Hang on....  by 'davidmc'   (13 Aug 2010 @ 15:17)
Re: Ok, you two! Hang on....  by 'itpro'   (13 Aug 2010 @ 15:40)
Re: Ok, you two! Hang on....  by 'itpro'   (13 Aug 2010 @ 15:51)
Re: Itpro  by 'davidmc'   (13 Aug 2010 @ 16:01)
Re: Ok, you two! Hang on....  by 'itpro'   (13 Aug 2010 @ 16:20)
Re: Ok, you two! Hang on....  by 'DavyBoy'   (13 Aug 2010 @ 17:57)
Re: Ok, you two! Hang on....  by 'itpro'   (16 Aug 2010 @ 14:09)
Itpro  by 'davidmc'   (16 Aug 2010 @ 15:00)
Re: Ok, you two! Hang on....  by 'itpro'   (16 Aug 2010 @ 21:10)
Re: Ok, you two!  by 'davidmc'   (13 Aug 2010 @ 11:53)
Re: Ok, you two!  by 'itpro'   (13 Aug 2010 @ 12:14)
Re: Ok, you two!  by 'davidmc'   (13 Aug 2010 @ 13:07)
Re: Ok, you two!  by 'itpro'   (13 Aug 2010 @ 14:32)
Re: Ok, you two!  by 'RoadRat'   (13 Aug 2010 @ 15:06)
RoadRat  by 'itpro'   (13 Aug 2010 @ 16:08)
Re: Ok, you two!  by 'davidmc'   (13 Aug 2010 @ 15:13)
Re: Ok, you two!  by 'itpro'   (13 Aug 2010 @ 15:53)
Re: Ok, you two!  by 'Traxtar'   (16 Aug 2010 @ 18:10)
Re: Ok, you two!  by 'itpro'   (16 Aug 2010 @ 21:15)
Re: We'll see.......  by 'Aquila'   (10 Aug 2010 @ 21:31)
Re: We'll see.......  by 'itpro'   (10 Aug 2010 @ 22:01)
Re: We'll see.......  by 'itpro'   (10 Aug 2010 @ 21:56)
Re: We'll see.......  by 'RoadRat'   (11 Aug 2010 @ 11:23)
Re: We'll see.......  by 'PaulMRotax'   (11 Aug 2010 @ 20:55)
Re: We'll see.......  by 'Newshound'   (11 Aug 2010 @ 21:14)
Re: We'll see.......  by 'PaulMRotax'   (11 Aug 2010 @ 21:34)
Re: We'll see....... Newshound  by 'itpro'   (11 Aug 2010 @ 21:54)
Re: We'll see....... Newshound  by 'PaulMRotax'   (12 Aug 2010 @ 7:45)
Re: We'll see....... Newshound  by 'itpro'   (12 Aug 2010 @ 10:19)
Re: We'll see....... Newshound  by 'PaulMRotax'   (12 Aug 2010 @ 18:44)
Here's the 'WINNER' by Paul!  by 'itpro'   (13 Aug 2010 @ 11:27)
Re: Here's the 'WINNER' by Paul!  by 'PaulMRotax'   (13 Aug 2010 @ 18:40)
Re: Here's the 'WINNER' by Paul!  by 'itpro'   (16 Aug 2010 @ 12:25)
Re: Here's the 'WINNER' by Paul!  by 'PaulMRotax'   (17 Aug 2010 @ 21:15)
Paul.....  by 'itpro'   (11 Aug 2010 @ 22:07)
Re: Paul.....  by 'Doink'   (12 Aug 2010 @ 0:11)
Re: Paul.....  by 'itpro'   (12 Aug 2010 @ 10:29)
Re: Paul.....  by 'PaulMRotax'   (12 Aug 2010 @ 18:47)
Re: We'll see.......  by 'Newshound'   (11 Aug 2010 @ 22:20)
Re: We'll see.......  by 'stevenw'   (12 Aug 2010 @ 1:08)
Re: We'll see.......  by 'Aquila'   (12 Aug 2010 @ 7:30)
Re: We'll see.......  by 'PaulMRotax'   (12 Aug 2010 @ 7:39)
Re: We'll see.......  by 'Newshound'   (12 Aug 2010 @ 8:58)
Newshound  by 'stevenw'   (12 Aug 2010 @ 9:05)
Re: Newshound  by 'Newshound'   (12 Aug 2010 @ 9:09)
Re: Newshound  by 'stevenw'   (12 Aug 2010 @ 9:20)
Re: We'll see.......  by 'PaulMRotax'   (12 Aug 2010 @ 18:49)
Re: We'll see.......  by 'PaulMRotax'   (12 Aug 2010 @ 7:51)
Re: We'll see.......  by 'RoadRat'   (12 Aug 2010 @ 8:38)
Re: We'll see.......  by 'Aquila'   (12 Aug 2010 @ 9:00)
Re: We'll see.......  by 'itpro'   (12 Aug 2010 @ 10:07)
Re: We'll see.......  by 'RoadRat'   (12 Aug 2010 @ 11:18)
Re: We'll see.......  by 'itpro'   (12 Aug 2010 @ 11:44)
Re: We'll see.......  by 'Doink'   (12 Aug 2010 @ 12:00)
Re: We'll see.......  by 'itpro'   (12 Aug 2010 @ 13:34)
Re: We'll see.......  by 'RoadRat'   (12 Aug 2010 @ 12:25)
Re: We'll see.......  by 'itpro'   (12 Aug 2010 @ 13:26)
Re: We'll see.......  by 'davidmc'   (12 Aug 2010 @ 18:51)
Re: We'll see.......  by 'itpro'   (13 Aug 2010 @ 11:01)
Re: We'll see.......  by 'davidmc'   (13 Aug 2010 @ 12:02)
Re: We'll see.......  by 'itpro'   (13 Aug 2010 @ 12:19)
Re: We'll see.......  by 'davidmc'   (13 Aug 2010 @ 13:12)
Re: We'll see.......  by 'Aquila'   (12 Aug 2010 @ 12:12)
Re: We'll see.......  by 'Newshound'   (12 Aug 2010 @ 13:41)
Re: We'll see.......  by 'itpro'   (12 Aug 2010 @ 13:48)
Re: We'll see.......  by 'itpro'   (12 Aug 2010 @ 13:45)
Re: We'll see.......  by 'Aquila'   (12 Aug 2010 @ 14:13)
Re: We'll see.......  by 'itpro'   (12 Aug 2010 @ 14:40)
Re: We'll see.......  by 'PaulMRotax'   (12 Aug 2010 @ 18:54)
Re: We'll see.......  by 'itpro'   (13 Aug 2010 @ 11:03)
Re: We'll see.......  by 'buzzinrussell'   (12 Aug 2010 @ 14:38)
Re: We'll see.......  by 'Aquila'   (12 Aug 2010 @ 14:41)
Re: We'll see.......  by 'itpro'   (12 Aug 2010 @ 14:47)
Re: We'll see.......  by 'itpro'   (12 Aug 2010 @ 14:45)
Re: We'll see.......  by 'Gillard77'   (12 Aug 2010 @ 16:36)
Re: We'll see.......  by 'Newshound'   (12 Aug 2010 @ 16:53)
Re: We'll see.......  by 'davidmc'   (12 Aug 2010 @ 19:04)
Newshound  by 'itpro'   (13 Aug 2010 @ 11:33)
Re: We'll see.......  by 'buzzinrussell'   (12 Aug 2010 @ 20:54)
Be careful Russ.......  by 'Newshound'   (12 Aug 2010 @ 21:24)
Re: Be careful Russ.......  by 'buzzinrussell'   (12 Aug 2010 @ 22:15)
Re: Be careful Russ.......  by 'PaulMRotax'   (12 Aug 2010 @ 22:35)
Re: We'll see.......  by 'itpro'   (13 Aug 2010 @ 11:45)
Firmly touching wood as I type.  by 'RoadRat'   (13 Aug 2010 @ 18:44)
Did I really say that.......  by 'RoadRat'   (14 Aug 2010 @ 7:40)
Re: Did I really say that.......  by 'Doink'   (14 Aug 2010 @ 12:21)
For those who think I claim to be perfect....  by 'itpro'   (16 Aug 2010 @ 12:36)
Re: For those who think I claim to be perfect....  by 'Gillard77'   (16 Aug 2010 @ 15:30)
Re: For those who think I claim to be perfect....  by 'itpro'   (17 Aug 2010 @ 0:05)
Re: For those who think I claim to be perfect....  by 'PaulMRotax'   (19 Aug 2010 @ 7:48)
Gillard  by 'itpro'   (13 Aug 2010 @ 11:29)
Re: Gillard  by 'Gillard77'   (13 Aug 2010 @ 13:01)

Post a Reply:
You may post a direct reply to this message which will appear in this thread.
To post a new or unrelated message use This Form.
Reply To "Re: Its not quite the same Ian"
Email Address :   Not Registered? Click Here to register...
Password :   Passwords are Case Sensitive!   [ Password Lookup ]
Message Title / Subject :
Message :
Options : Subscribe to this thread?   [ More Information ]

Top of Page
Notice Board Index

[ UK Karting Main Index ]


News Karts and Karting Notice Board Market Place Companies Directory Tracks Directory Events Calendar Race Results Photo Gallery Links
News Karts &
Karting
Notice
Board
Market
Place
Companies
Directory
Tracks
Directory
Events
Calendar
Race
Results
Photo
Gallery
Links

UK Karting

Copyright © 1996-2018 UK Karting
Comments, Suggestions etc. mail@karting.co.uk