UK Karting

Notice Board (2-Stroke Karting)




Re: Hold on......
Posted by 'Liam' on 12 Aug 2010 @ 18:51


| View Message Thread | Reply to this message |
Liam
Joined: March 2010
Total Posts: 1
[ View User Profile ]
Yes, I'll grant there's an increase in moment of inertia, but the power required to accelerate a clutch is pretty low. But I accept it's a disadvantage.

A DD can of course stall if the kart is rolling, but you'd have to lock the rear end on the brakes. It then bump starts itself as soon as you get off the brake. If you release the throttle on a clutched kart the clutch remains engaged until the road speed becomes low enough for the clutch to disengage. Looking at the data on my TAG that's below 4600 rpm, which is much lower than any speed I ever see on the track. I HAVE made the clutch disengage by braking too hard, but as soon as you touch the throttle it re-engages at revs to suit the road speed (about 9000 rpm into the hairpin at Hooton).

The idea that the engine is driving the kart forward because there is a tickover on a clutched kart is obviously not true. As long as the engine speed is above tickover speed on a shut throttle the engine is not driving the kart forward, but slowing it down - just like a direct drive engine - or your road car. As for engines running hotter because they have less engine braking effect - not something I've noticed even on 4 strokes where engine braking effects are much more pronounced than 2 strokes.

You're right about it being personal preference as to who runs a clutch, so I find it a bit weird that you're making stuff up about engines running hotter if they have a tickover to try and convince people. If you think about the energetics of the situation the reverse is more likely to be true.

Liam

Message Thread:

TKM DD v TAG v Clutch  by 'glittttt'   (10 Aug 2010 @ 16:50)
Re: TKM DD v TAG v Clutch  by 'itpro'   (10 Aug 2010 @ 17:13)
Re: TKM DD v TAG v Clutch  by 'Traxtar'   (10 Aug 2010 @ 19:11)
Re: TKM DD v TAG v Clutch  by 'Attack2001'   (10 Aug 2010 @ 20:05)
Re: TKM DD v TAG v Clutch  by 'chriskasch'   (10 Aug 2010 @ 20:20)
Re: TKM DD v TAG v Clutch  by 'itpro'   (10 Aug 2010 @ 20:26)
Re: TKM DD v TAG v Clutch  by 'davidmc'   (10 Aug 2010 @ 20:36)
Re: TKM DD v TAG v Clutch  by 'Attack2001'   (10 Aug 2010 @ 20:37)
Re: TKM DD v TAG v Clutch  by 'davidmc'   (10 Aug 2010 @ 20:49)
Re: TKM DD v TAG v Clutch  by 'Attack2001'   (10 Aug 2010 @ 20:26)
Re: TKM DD v TAG v Clutch  by 'itpro'   (10 Aug 2010 @ 20:34)
Re: TKM DD v TAG v Clutch  by 'Attack2001'   (10 Aug 2010 @ 21:40)
Re: TKM DD v TAG v Clutch  by 'Liam'   (10 Aug 2010 @ 20:33)
Re: TKM DD v TAG v Clutch  by 'itpro'   (10 Aug 2010 @ 20:46)
Re: TKM DD v TAG v Clutch  by 'davidmc'   (10 Aug 2010 @ 20:55)
Re: TKM DD v TAG v Clutch  by 'drewdt3'   (10 Aug 2010 @ 23:48)
Re: TKM DD v TAG v Clutch  by 'Liam'   (10 Aug 2010 @ 21:02)
Re: TKM DD v TAG v Clutch  by 'glittttt'   (11 Aug 2010 @ 9:16)
Re: TKM DD v TAG v Clutch  by 'itpro'   (11 Aug 2010 @ 10:32)
Re: TKM DD v TAG v Clutch  by 'NickyW'   (11 Aug 2010 @ 11:42)
Re: TKM DD v TAG v Clutch  by 'glittttt'   (11 Aug 2010 @ 13:43)
Re: TKM DD v TAG v Clutch  by 'glittttt'   (11 Aug 2010 @ 13:44)
Re: TKM DD v TAG v Clutch  by 'Traxtar'   (11 Aug 2010 @ 14:03)
Re: TKM DD v TAG v Clutch  by 'Liam'   (11 Aug 2010 @ 14:13)
Re: TKM DD v TAG v Clutch  by 'buzzinrussell'   (11 Aug 2010 @ 14:58)
Re: TKM DD v TAG v Clutch  by 'itpro'   (11 Aug 2010 @ 16:33)
Re: TKM DD v TAG v Clutch  by 'DCharity'   (11 Aug 2010 @ 17:31)
Re: TKM DD v TAG v Clutch  by 'chriskasch'   (11 Aug 2010 @ 17:39)
Re: Chris  by 'Attack2001'   (11 Aug 2010 @ 20:58)
Re: TKM DD v TAG v Clutch  by 'Traxtar'   (11 Aug 2010 @ 17:49)
Re: TKM DD v TAG v Clutch  by 'DCharity'   (11 Aug 2010 @ 19:34)
Re: TKM DD v TAG v Clutch  by 'Liam'   (11 Aug 2010 @ 22:12)
Re: TKM DD v TAG v Clutch  by 'glittttt'   (11 Aug 2010 @ 22:14)
Hold on......  by 'itpro'   (11 Aug 2010 @ 22:33)
Re: Hold on......  by 'DCharity'   (12 Aug 2010 @ 16:02)
Re: Hold on......  by 'Liam'  << You are here!
Re: Hold on......  by 'Traxtar'   (12 Aug 2010 @ 19:34)
Re: Hold on......  by 'Liam'   (12 Aug 2010 @ 21:07)
Re: Hold on......  by 'Traxtar'   (12 Aug 2010 @ 19:47)
Re: Hold on......  by 'Liam'   (12 Aug 2010 @ 21:18)
Re: Hold on......  by 'iant'   (12 Aug 2010 @ 21:47)
Re: Hold on......  by 'Liam'   (13 Aug 2010 @ 0:03)
Errrr..... Liam  by 'itpro'   (13 Aug 2010 @ 15:10)
Re: Hold on......  by 'Liam'   (13 Aug 2010 @ 15:46)
Re: Hold on......  by 'itpro'   (13 Aug 2010 @ 16:38)
Re: Hold on......  by 'Liam'   (13 Aug 2010 @ 17:32)
Apologies, Liam  by 'itpro'   (16 Aug 2010 @ 13:35)
Re: Hold on......  by 'davidmc'   (12 Aug 2010 @ 23:45)
Re: Hold on......  by 'itpro'   (13 Aug 2010 @ 15:13)
Re: Hold on......  by 'BanzaiBoy'   (13 Aug 2010 @ 15:26)
Re: Hold on......  by 'itpro'   (13 Aug 2010 @ 16:31)
Re: Hold on...... errrrrr....  by 'itpro'   (13 Aug 2010 @ 15:07)
Re: Hold on...... errrrrr....  by 'Liam'   (13 Aug 2010 @ 15:49)
Re: Hold on...... errrrrr....  by 'itpro'   (13 Aug 2010 @ 16:30)
Re: Hold on...... errrrrr....  by 'Liam'   (13 Aug 2010 @ 17:54)
Liam....., sorry, mate, you are WRONG!.  by 'itpro'   (16 Aug 2010 @ 13:57)
Re: Liam....., sorry, mate, you are WRONG!.  by 'Liam'   (16 Aug 2010 @ 18:19)
Re: Liam....., sorry, mate, you are WRONG!.  by 'davidmc'   (16 Aug 2010 @ 18:42)
David........ and Liam  by 'itpro'   (16 Aug 2010 @ 22:03)
Re: Liam....., sorry, mate, you are WRONG!.  by 'Liam'   (16 Aug 2010 @ 22:28)
Re: Liam....., sorry, mate, you are WRONG!.  by 'itpro'   (16 Aug 2010 @ 23:23)
Re: Liam....., sorry, mate, you are WRONG!.  by 'Liam'   (17 Aug 2010 @ 0:07)
Re: Liam....., sorry, mate, you are WRONG!.  by 'itpro'   (17 Aug 2010 @ 0:21)
Re: Liam....., sorry, mate, you are WRONG!.  by 'Liam'   (17 Aug 2010 @ 9:09)
Re: Liam....., sorry, mate, you are WRONG!.  by 'itpro'   (17 Aug 2010 @ 10:18)
Re: TKM DD v TAG v Clutch  by 'Traxtar'   (11 Aug 2010 @ 22:33)
Re: TKM DD v TAG v Clutch  by 'davidmc'   (12 Aug 2010 @ 19:19)
Re: TKM DD v TAG v Clutch  by 'Liam'   (12 Aug 2010 @ 21:29)
Re: TKM DD v TAG v Clutch  by 'itpro'   (13 Aug 2010 @ 15:20)
Re: TKM DD v TAG v Clutch  by 'Liam'   (13 Aug 2010 @ 15:56)
Re: TKM DD v TAG v Clutch  by 'itpro'   (13 Aug 2010 @ 16:34)
Re: TKM DD v TAG v Clutch  by 'BiPed'   (11 Aug 2010 @ 16:45)
Re: TKM DD v TAG v Clutch  by 'itpro'   (11 Aug 2010 @ 22:35)
Re: Liam - DD sprocket  by 'iant'   (13 Aug 2010 @ 22:14)
Re: Liam - DD sprocket  by 'Liam'   (13 Aug 2010 @ 22:26)
Re: Liam - DD sprocket  by 'iant'   (13 Aug 2010 @ 22:42)
Re: Liam - DD sprocket  by 'MJW'   (14 Aug 2010 @ 18:15)

Post a Reply:
You may post a direct reply to this message which will appear in this thread.
To post a new or unrelated message use This Form.
Reply To "Re: Hold on......"
Email Address :   Not Registered? Click Here to register...
Password :   Passwords are Case Sensitive!   [ Password Lookup ]
Message Title / Subject :
Message :
Options : Subscribe to this thread?   [ More Information ]

Top of Page
Notice Board Index

[ UK Karting Main Index ]


News Karts and Karting Notice Board Market Place Companies Directory Tracks Directory Events Calendar Race Results Photo Gallery Links
News Karts &
Karting
Notice
Board
Market
Place
Companies
Directory
Tracks
Directory
Events
Calendar
Race
Results
Photo
Gallery
Links

UK Karting

Copyright © 1996-2018 UK Karting
Comments, Suggestions etc. mail@karting.co.uk