I know I wasn't there, but I've done plenty of research into it in my time..
The management was cr@ p because it didn't NEED to be good, because they were simply bailed out if they were good or bad. There was no intensive to have good management!
Unions had too much power once again I agree, the free market didn't take its course and people were demanding more than they were worth.
If Leyland were allowed to fail, someone more capable would have come along and gone "right, what was wrong here"
"the management is cr@ p, leading to cr@ p quality ok we will fix it"
I don't see where we are disagreeing??
|
|