|  |  | Notice Board (Chat) |  | 
 
  
 
	
	 
 

| 
 | ||||||||
|   Re: Continued from SAFE SPEED thread.  by 'DanTheK1RaceGearMan'   (01 Apr 2009 @ 9:04)   Re: Continued from SAFE SPEED thread.  by 'davidmc'   (01 Apr 2009 @ 10:14)    David  by 'itpro'   (01 Apr 2009 @ 11:37)     Re: David  by 'DanTheK1RaceGearMan'   (01 Apr 2009 @ 12:56)   Re: Continued from SAFE SPEED thread.  by 'itpro'   (01 Apr 2009 @ 11:32)    Re: Continued from SAFE SPEED thread.  by 'DanTheK1RaceGearMan'   (01 Apr 2009 @ 13:06)     This stuff is NOT complex!  by 'itpro'   (01 Apr 2009 @ 15:54)      Re: Still avoiding the simple question itpro/tangl  by 'JohnClucas'   (01 Apr 2009 @ 17:11)       Re: Still avoiding the simple question itpro/tangl  by 'PaulMRotax'   (01 Apr 2009 @ 17:31)        Paul  by 'itpro'   (01 Apr 2009 @ 19:52)         Re: Paul  by 'PaulMRotax'   (02 Apr 2009 @ 8:19)          Re: Paul  by 'itpro'   (02 Apr 2009 @ 10:15)           Re: Paul  by 'PaulMRotax'   (02 Apr 2009 @ 10:22)            Re: Paul  by 'itpro'   (02 Apr 2009 @ 11:23)             Re: Paul  by 'PaulMRotax'   (02 Apr 2009 @ 12:33)       Re: Still avoiding the simple question itpro/tangl  by 'JohnClucas'   (01 Apr 2009 @ 17:41)       -John: still avoid the simple question itpro/tangl  by 'TanglerTKM'   (01 Apr 2009 @ 17:47)        Re: -John: still avoid the simple question itpro/t  by 'JohnClucas'   (01 Apr 2009 @ 19:35)         Re: -John: still avoid the simple question itpro/t  by 'itpro'   (01 Apr 2009 @ 19:54)          Re: -John: still avoid the simple question itpro/t  by 'JohnClucas'   (01 Apr 2009 @ 19:59)           Re: -John: still avoid the simple question itpro/t  by 'TanglerTKM'   (01 Apr 2009 @ 22:45)            Re: That just sums it up Tangler!!!!  by 'DanTheK1RaceGearMan'   (02 Apr 2009 @ 7:56)             Re: That just sums it up Tangler!!!!  by 'DanTheK1RaceGearMan'   (02 Apr 2009 @ 8:24)              Dan.......  by 'itpro'   (02 Apr 2009 @ 11:17)               Re: Dan.......  by 'DanTheK1RaceGearMan'   (02 Apr 2009 @ 11:36)                Re: Dan.......  by 'itpro'   (02 Apr 2009 @ 15:07)                 Try thinking about it Dan  by 'TanglerTKM'   (02 Apr 2009 @ 18:58)                  Re: ARE YOU  thinking about it Tangler?  by 'DanTheK1RaceGearMan'   (02 Apr 2009 @ 19:24)                   Re: ARE YOU  thinking about it Tangler?  by 'DanTheK1RaceGearMan'   (02 Apr 2009 @ 19:26)                    Re: ARE YOU  thinking about it Tangler?  by 'itpro'   (02 Apr 2009 @ 19:39)                     Re: ARE YOU  thinking about it Tangler?  by 'DanTheK1RaceGearMan'  << You are here!                      Re: ARE YOU  thinking about it Tangler?  by 'itpro'   (02 Apr 2009 @ 20:07)                      *sigh*  by 'TanglerTKM'   (02 Apr 2009 @ 20:08)                  Re: Excuse me Tangler  by 'JohnClucas'   (02 Apr 2009 @ 19:26)                   Re: Excuse me Tangler  by 'itpro'   (02 Apr 2009 @ 20:16)                    Re: Typical ipro - no interest in facts or context  by 'JohnClucas'   (02 Apr 2009 @ 22:29)                 Re: Dan.......  by 'DanTheK1RaceGearMan'   (02 Apr 2009 @ 19:38)               Re: Dan.......  by 'PaulMRotax'   (02 Apr 2009 @ 12:38)                Re: Dan.......  by 'itpro'   (02 Apr 2009 @ 15:09)                 Re: Dan.......  by 'PaulMRotax'   (02 Apr 2009 @ 19:53)                  Re: Dan.......  by 'itpro'   (02 Apr 2009 @ 20:09)                   Re: Dan.......  by 'PaulMRotax'   (02 Apr 2009 @ 23:35)       I'll answer YOUR question the first time YOU....  by 'itpro'   (01 Apr 2009 @ 19:50)        Re: I'll answer YOUR question the first time YOU..  by 'JohnClucas'   (01 Apr 2009 @ 20:06)         Re: I'll answer YOUR question the first time YOU..  by 'DanTheK1RaceGearMan'   (01 Apr 2009 @ 20:35)          where are we with this?  by 'TanglerTKM'   (01 Apr 2009 @ 23:08)           Re: where are we with this?  by 'Booney'   (01 Apr 2009 @ 23:29)           Re: where are we with this?  by 'DanTheK1RaceGearMan'   (02 Apr 2009 @ 7:40)            Ok...getting somewhere! Booney & Dan  by 'TanglerTKM'   (02 Apr 2009 @ 19:17)             Re: Now that is real progress Tangler!!!!  by 'DanTheK1RaceGearMan'   (02 Apr 2009 @ 19:47)              Re: Now that is real progress Tangler!!!!  by 'TanglerTKM'   (02 Apr 2009 @ 20:13)               Re: Now that is real progress Tangler!!!!  by 'DanTheK1RaceGearMan'   (02 Apr 2009 @ 20:36)                Re: Now that is real progress Tangler!!!!  by 'TanglerTKM'   (02 Apr 2009 @ 20:57)           Re: Tangler  by 'JohnClucas'   (02 Apr 2009 @ 8:15)            Re: Tangler  by 'itpro'   (02 Apr 2009 @ 11:26)            John  by 'TanglerTKM'   (02 Apr 2009 @ 18:44)             Re: Tangler - well actually YES someone did die  by 'JohnClucas'   (02 Apr 2009 @ 19:41)              Re: Tangler - well actually YES someone did die  by 'TanglerTKM'   (02 Apr 2009 @ 20:21)               For goodness sake Tangler  by 'JohnClucas'   (02 Apr 2009 @ 22:33)                John  by 'TanglerTKM'   (02 Apr 2009 @ 23:38)          Re: I'll answer YOUR question the first time YOU..  by 'itpro'   (02 Apr 2009 @ 11:10)           Re: I'll answer YOUR question the first time YOU..  by 'JohnClucas'   (02 Apr 2009 @ 11:50)            Re: I'll answer YOUR question the first time YOU..  by 'itpro'   (02 Apr 2009 @ 15:08)             Re: I'll answer YOUR question the first time YOU..  by 'JohnClucas'   (02 Apr 2009 @ 19:12)              Re: I'll answer YOUR question the first time YOU..  by 'itpro'   (02 Apr 2009 @ 20:30)             Re: Sorry I should have said..  by 'JohnClucas'   (02 Apr 2009 @ 19:15)              Re: Sorry I should have said..  by 'itpro'   (02 Apr 2009 @ 19:53)               Re: So answer the question  by 'JohnClucas'   (02 Apr 2009 @ 19:59)                Re: So answer the question  by 'itpro'   (02 Apr 2009 @ 20:13)                 Gentlemen....I suggest you look here......  by 'QuickOldTimer'   (02 Apr 2009 @ 21:08)                  Re: Gentlemen....I suggest you look here......  by 'TanglerTKM'   (02 Apr 2009 @ 21:37)                   Re: Do be scientific  by 'JohnClucas'   (02 Apr 2009 @ 21:59)                    Re: Do be scientific...get it right...  by 'QuickOldTimer'   (02 Apr 2009 @ 22:04)                     Re: Do be scientific...get it right...  by 'JohnClucas'   (02 Apr 2009 @ 22:15)                      john.....ahem  by 'TanglerTKM'   (02 Apr 2009 @ 23:47)                       Re: er Tangler no  by 'JohnClucas'   (03 Apr 2009 @ 12:08)                        John....you're arguing against yourself now!  by 'TanglerTKM'   (03 Apr 2009 @ 12:27)                         Re: no I'm not!!!  by 'JohnClucas'   (03 Apr 2009 @ 12:51)                          Re: no I'm not!!!  by 'TanglerTKM'   (03 Apr 2009 @ 16:00)                           Re: Try logic tangler  by 'JohnClucas'   (03 Apr 2009 @ 17:32)                        and i thought it was blue.....  by 'Avago'   (03 Apr 2009 @ 12:43)      Re: This stuff is NOT complex!  by 'DanTheK1RaceGearMan'   (01 Apr 2009 @ 20:49)       Re: This stuff is NOT complex!  by 'itpro'   (02 Apr 2009 @ 11:00)        Re: This stuff is NOT complex!  by 'PaulMRotax'   (02 Apr 2009 @ 12:39)         I really can't understand.....  by 'vic'   (02 Apr 2009 @ 13:01)         Re: Unfortunately vic  by 'JohnClucas'   (02 Apr 2009 @ 17:01)          John will do his BEST to avoid this BUT.....  by 'itpro'   (02 Apr 2009 @ 19:28)           Re: No he won't,   put up or shut up  by 'JohnClucas'   (02 Apr 2009 @ 19:47)            Re: No he won't,   put up or shut up  by 'itpro'   (02 Apr 2009 @ 20:10)             One for the mix  by 'Booney'   (02 Apr 2009 @ 23:24)              Re: One for the mix  by 'TanglerTKM'   (02 Apr 2009 @ 23:55)               Re: One for the mix  by 'PaulMRotax'   (03 Apr 2009 @ 7:59)                Re: One for the mix  by 'TanglerTKM'   (03 Apr 2009 @ 8:59)                 Re: One for the mix  by 'PaulMRotax'   (03 Apr 2009 @ 11:17)                  Re: One for the mix  by 'TanglerTKM'   (03 Apr 2009 @ 16:10)                   Re: One for the mix  by 'DanTheK1RaceGearMan'   (03 Apr 2009 @ 20:00)              Accidents are NOT accidents because....  by 'Avago'   (03 Apr 2009 @ 12:56)               Re: Accidents are NOT accidents because....  by 'Booney'   (03 Apr 2009 @ 17:33)               Re: Accidents are NOT accidents because....  by 'PaulMRotax'   (04 Apr 2009 @ 14:02)          Re: Unfortunately vic....  by 'vic'   (03 Apr 2009 @ 12:51)           Re: Unfortunately vic....  by 'JohnClucas'   (03 Apr 2009 @ 14:36)            Re: Unfortunately vic....  by 'vic'   (03 Apr 2009 @ 19:37)             Re: Unfortunately vic....  by 'JohnClucas'   (03 Apr 2009 @ 20:12)              Re: Telepathy or what!  by 'DanTheK1RaceGearMan'   (03 Apr 2009 @ 20:26)             Re: Unfortunately vic....  by 'DanTheK1RaceGearMan'   (03 Apr 2009 @ 20:21)              Dan & John  by 'TanglerTKM'   (03 Apr 2009 @ 20:56)               Re: And the conclusion...  by 'DanTheK1RaceGearMan'   (03 Apr 2009 @ 21:29)                The reason speed is made an issue  by 'TanglerTKM'   (03 Apr 2009 @ 21:58)                 Re: The reason speed is made an issue  by 'DanTheK1RaceGearMan'   (03 Apr 2009 @ 22:10)                  Re: The reason speed is made an issue  by 'DanTheK1RaceGearMan'   (03 Apr 2009 @ 22:20)                   Re: The reason speed is made an issue  by 'TanglerTKM'   (03 Apr 2009 @ 22:26)                    Re: The reason speed is made an issue  by 'DanTheK1RaceGearMan'   (03 Apr 2009 @ 22:44)                  Re: The reason speed is made an issue  by 'TanglerTKM'   (03 Apr 2009 @ 22:22)                   Re: The reason speed is made an issue  by 'DanTheK1RaceGearMan'   (03 Apr 2009 @ 22:47)                 Re: The reason speed is made an issue  by 'JohnClucas'   (04 Apr 2009 @ 19:38)               Re: Tangler  by 'JohnClucas'   (03 Apr 2009 @ 21:37)                Re: Tangler  by 'TanglerTKM'   (03 Apr 2009 @ 22:05)                 Re: Tangler  by 'JohnClucas'   (04 Apr 2009 @ 12:42)                  Re:Enforce the things that matter  by 'QuickOldTimer'   (04 Apr 2009 @ 14:19)                   Re:Enforce the things that matter  by 'DanTheK1RaceGearMan'   (05 Apr 2009 @ 0:01)                    Re:Enforce the things that matter  by 'TanglerTKM'   (05 Apr 2009 @ 8:57)                     Re:Enforce the things that matter  by 'DanTheK1RaceGearMan'   (05 Apr 2009 @ 13:21)                      Re:Enforce the things that matter  by 'QuickOldTimer'   (05 Apr 2009 @ 17:47)                       Re:Enforce the things that matter  by 'TanglerTKM'   (05 Apr 2009 @ 18:38)                        Re:Enforce the things that matter  by 'DanTheK1RaceGearMan'   (05 Apr 2009 @ 20:05)                         Re:Enforce the things that matter  by 'JohnClucas'   (05 Apr 2009 @ 21:28)                        Re:Enforce the things that matter  by 'DanTheK1RaceGearMan'   (06 Apr 2009 @ 7:24)             Re: and what about consistency in punishment  by 'JohnClucas'   (03 Apr 2009 @ 20:47)        Re: This stuff is NOT complex!  by 'DanTheK1RaceGearMan'   (03 Apr 2009 @ 20:37)         Re: This stuff is NOT complex!  by 'DevonHawker'   (03 Apr 2009 @ 20:48) | 
|  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 
| News | Karts & Karting | Notice Board | Market Place | Companies Directory | Tracks Directory | Events Calendar | Race Results | Photo Gallery | Links | 
|   | Copyright © 1996-2018 UK Karting Comments, Suggestions etc. mail@karting.co.uk |