UK Karting

Notice Board (Chat)




Re: a little economical with the facts..Ian ?
Posted by 'Bod' on 27 Oct 2009 @ 18:17


| View Message Thread | Reply to this message |
Bod
Joined: July 2009
Total Posts: 1
[ View User Profile ]
I don't object to the concept of emphasis in text. Exclamation marks and other punctuation has been used and become acceptable through common usage
Unfortunately since the beginning of the internet it has become accepted in 'chat' that using capitals is shouting. I don't mind you “”emphasising”” words but I do mind being ((shouted )) at. *Capitals* have become shouting through common usage and you can't just use them now for mere emphasis, as you would an underline or italics, etc. The same as if your exclamation mark key stopped working, you can't just use a ^question mark^ instead. So when I read your posts you're not ...emphasising... you are shouting.
I don't mind #sarcasm#, your ~overuse~ of emphasis, or even most, so called, \\offensive// comments on the hole, but I ¬hate¬ shouting.
But as I said in my first post, perhaps its just me.
I've tried some methods on the way to emphasise words, I hope one works for you. I don't know what they will look like when posted to the site because I don't know if all characters are supported until I post. If they do work I particularly like *this* because it does emphasise the word, and has slight irony of producing bold text in some word processes.
An alternative is to not emphasise at all. Controversial I know, but others seem to manage.
Do you find it difficult to understand other posts if people don't shout certain words at you?
The over use of emphasis in any text looses its emphasis and makes it harder to understand, not easier. If you do still feel the need to shout, please only shout when appropriate.

Regards Phill.

Message Thread:

question time  by 'kudos'   (23 Oct 2009 @ 1:18)
Re: question time  by 'itpro'   (23 Oct 2009 @ 2:33)
PR may be flawed but  by 'bt3962'   (23 Oct 2009 @ 6:01)
Re: PR may be flawed but  by 'BanzaiBoy'   (23 Oct 2009 @ 8:17)
Re: question time  by 'IainB'   (23 Oct 2009 @ 8:18)
Re: question time  by 'PhilD'   (23 Oct 2009 @ 9:21)
Re: question time  by 'BanzaiBoy'   (23 Oct 2009 @ 9:25)
Re: question time  by 'QuickOldTimer'   (23 Oct 2009 @ 9:44)
Re: question time  by 'DavidG'   (23 Oct 2009 @ 10:05)
Re: question time  by 'DavidG'   (23 Oct 2009 @ 10:18)
Re: question time  by 'SimonS'   (23 Oct 2009 @ 9:37)
Re: question time  by 'Chickenbone'   (23 Oct 2009 @ 10:16)
Re: question time  by 'RoadRat'   (23 Oct 2009 @ 10:40)
i take it that its a 2 part show??  by 'cosgrove78'   (23 Oct 2009 @ 10:57)
Cosgrove  by 'itpro'   (23 Oct 2009 @ 11:10)
Re: i take it that its a 2 part show??  by 'BanzaiBoy'   (23 Oct 2009 @ 11:12)
Re: i take it that its a 2 part show??  by 'itpro'   (23 Oct 2009 @ 11:42)
Re: i take it that its a 2 part show??  by 'BanzaiBoy'   (23 Oct 2009 @ 11:50)
Re: i take it that its a 2 part show??  by 'itpro'   (23 Oct 2009 @ 11:55)
Re: i take it that its a 2 part show??  by 'BanzaiBoy'   (23 Oct 2009 @ 12:05)
Re: i take it that its a 2 part show??  by 'QuickOldTimer'   (23 Oct 2009 @ 12:11)
Re: i take it that its a 2 part show??  by 'itpro'   (23 Oct 2009 @ 12:19)
Re: i take it that its a 2 part show??  by 'QuickOldTimer'   (23 Oct 2009 @ 12:23)
Re: i take it that its a 2 part show??  by 'itpro'   (23 Oct 2009 @ 12:30)
Re: i take it that its a 2 part show??  by 'QuickOldTimer'   (23 Oct 2009 @ 12:33)
Re: i take it that its a 2 part show??  by 'itpro'   (23 Oct 2009 @ 12:39)
Re: i take it that its a 2 part show??  by 'QuickOldTimer'   (23 Oct 2009 @ 12:42)
Re: i take it that its a 2 part show??  by 'QuickOldTimer'   (23 Oct 2009 @ 12:47)
Re: i take it that its a 2 part show??  by 'itpro'   (27 Oct 2009 @ 10:09)
Re: i take it that its a 2 part show??  by 'itpro'   (23 Oct 2009 @ 12:17)
It was question time, but where were the....  by 'alanrr'   (23 Oct 2009 @ 12:02)
Re: It was question time, but where were the....  by 'itpro'   (23 Oct 2009 @ 12:25)
Re: question time  by 'Ldriver'   (23 Oct 2009 @ 11:42)
Re: question time  by 'itpro'   (23 Oct 2009 @ 11:51)
Simon,,,,,,  by 'itpro'   (23 Oct 2009 @ 11:03)
Re: Ian,,,,,,  by 'BanzaiBoy'   (23 Oct 2009 @ 11:19)
Re: Ian,,,,,,  by 'itpro'   (23 Oct 2009 @ 11:34)
Re: Ian,,,,,,  by 'BanzaiBoy'   (23 Oct 2009 @ 12:01)
Re: Ian,,,,,,  by 'itpro'   (23 Oct 2009 @ 12:15)
Re: Ian,,,,,,  by 'Gillard77'   (23 Oct 2009 @ 12:20)
Re: Ian,,,,,,  by 'itpro'   (23 Oct 2009 @ 12:32)
Re: Ian,,,,,,  by 'Gillard77'   (23 Oct 2009 @ 12:53)
Re: Ian,,,,,,  by 'RoadRat'   (23 Oct 2009 @ 12:20)
Roadrat  by 'itpro'   (23 Oct 2009 @ 12:35)
Re: Roadrat  by 'Gillard77'   (23 Oct 2009 @ 12:56)
Re: Roadrat  by 'RoadRat'   (23 Oct 2009 @ 13:28)
Re: Roadrat  by 'RoadRat'   (24 Oct 2009 @ 9:51)
Re: Roadrat  by 'itpro'   (26 Oct 2009 @ 14:04)
Re: Roadrat  by 'RoadRat'   (26 Oct 2009 @ 14:24)
Re: Roadrat  by 'itpro'   (26 Oct 2009 @ 14:27)
The BNP vote will probably go through the roof....  by 'QuickOldTimer'   (26 Oct 2009 @ 15:07)
Re: The BNP vote will probably go through the roof  by 'itpro'   (26 Oct 2009 @ 17:37)
Ian.  by 'alanrr'   (23 Oct 2009 @ 12:23)
Re: Ian.  by 'itpro'   (23 Oct 2009 @ 12:45)
RoadRat  by 'kudos'   (23 Oct 2009 @ 23:30)
A dangerous future?  by 'Kartingdad'   (24 Oct 2009 @ 2:23)
Karting Dad  by 'itpro'   (26 Oct 2009 @ 13:46)
Why shout?  by 'Bod'   (26 Oct 2009 @ 20:00)
Re: Why shout?  by 'RoadRat'   (26 Oct 2009 @ 21:15)
Hi Bod!  by 'itpro'   (26 Oct 2009 @ 21:56)
Re: Hi Bod!  by 'buzzinrussell'   (27 Oct 2009 @ 0:12)
Re: Hi Bod!  by 'buzzinrussell'   (27 Oct 2009 @ 0:13)
a little economical with the facts..Ian ?  by 'Chads'   (27 Oct 2009 @ 2:28)
Re: a little economical with the facts..Ian ?  by 'Bod'  << You are here!
Re: a little economical with the facts..Ian ?  by 'itpro'   (27 Oct 2009 @ 23:31)
Re: a little economical with the facts..Ian ?  by 'Bod'   (28 Oct 2009 @ 0:31)
Re: a little economical with the facts..Ian ?  by 'itpro'   (28 Oct 2009 @ 10:48)

Post a Reply:
You may post a direct reply to this message which will appear in this thread.
To post a new or unrelated message use This Form.
Reply To "Re: a little economical with the facts..Ian ?"
Email Address :   Not Registered? Click Here to register...
Password :   Passwords are Case Sensitive!   [ Password Lookup ]
Message Title / Subject :
Message :
Options : Subscribe to this thread?   [ More Information ]

Top of Page
Notice Board Index

[ UK Karting Main Index ]


News Karts and Karting Notice Board Market Place Companies Directory Tracks Directory Events Calendar Race Results Photo Gallery Links
News Karts &
Karting
Notice
Board
Market
Place
Companies
Directory
Tracks
Directory
Events
Calendar
Race
Results
Photo
Gallery
Links

UK Karting

Copyright © 1996-2018 UK Karting
Comments, Suggestions etc. mail@karting.co.uk