UK Karting

Notice Board (Chat)




Re: Let's try this another way,,,,,,
Posted by 'davidmc' on 04 May 2011 @ 19:34


| View Message Thread | Reply to this message |
davidmc
Joined: April 2003
Total Posts: 2
[ View User Profile ]
"most drivers given tickets for speeding usually are driving safely for the conditions"

How do you know?

"errr, im not the one saying people die soley thro speed. see above for my answer to the second part."

I haven't you said you are. You have yet to provide one reason not to have speed limits nor a reason why excess speed should not be discouraged, nor why it cannot be the sole determining factor in an accident. All you have said is "all these other things cause deaths" (well duh... we all know that) and "we should have better drivers" (well duh... we all want that). In fact, nobody here has said people die soley through speed. People die in road accidents for all sorts of reasons. We have however said that speed:

a) Increases the consequences of an accident
b) Increases the chances of an accident occuring
c) Can be the sole determining factor in an accident (i.e. the only thing someone could have done differently is to have reduced their speed)

"a much better solution would be to introduce a black box recorder in all vehicles over time. the data only need be used following a collision or incident deemed worthy. a rolling 5 or 10mins record should suffice. the technology already exists and it will be a reality eventually im sure "

And how would that prevent accidents? As you yourself have stated, it would only be used after an accident. A little bit late then don't you think? Granted, it would have some benefits in improving vehicle safety and potentially, over a long period of time, driver training (but only by showing the types of accidents that occur and how they could be avoided).

Your argument basically boils down to, "I'd prefer not to have speed limits but accept they currently need to exist, Ian (and others) shouldn't say excess speed kills or try to discourage excess speeding, we should have better drivers and we should only concentrate on dangerous driving.

Remember, excess speed is one factor of dangerous driving that has been singled out because:

a) It is easy to police
b) It plays a large part in reducing the chances of an accident
c) It plays a large part in reducing the consequences of an accident.

Why is this a bad thing?

Message Thread:

speed kills ..... but how  by 'kudos'   (28 Apr 2011 @ 23:42)
Re: speed kills ..... but how  by 'Booney'   (28 Apr 2011 @ 23:57)
Re: speed kills ..... but how  by 'Newshound'   (29 Apr 2011 @ 0:01)
Re: speed kills ..... but how  by 'Booney'   (29 Apr 2011 @ 0:17)
Re: speed kills ..... but how  by 'itpro'   (29 Apr 2011 @ 0:50)
Re: speed kills ..... but how  by 'PaulMRotax'   (29 Apr 2011 @ 6:14)
Re: speed kills ..... but how  by 'Focused'   (29 Apr 2011 @ 7:38)
Re: speed kills ..... but how  by 'Attack2001'   (29 Apr 2011 @ 10:26)
Re: speed kills ..... but how  by 'Newshound'   (29 Apr 2011 @ 10:32)
Re: speed kills ..... but how  by 'Shanny'   (29 Apr 2011 @ 10:54)
Re: speed kills ..... but how  by 'HC64'   (29 Apr 2011 @ 13:19)
Re: speed kills ..... but how  by 'Newshound'   (29 Apr 2011 @ 13:30)
Re: speed kills ..... but how  by 'PaulMRotax'   (29 Apr 2011 @ 19:14)
Wait for it...  by 'Booney'   (29 Apr 2011 @ 13:35)
Re: Wait for it...  by 'Aquila'   (29 Apr 2011 @ 13:54)
Re: Wait for it...  by 'MattCortes'   (29 Apr 2011 @ 14:03)
Combination of factors Kill....  by 'jtthedevil'   (29 Apr 2011 @ 15:59)
Re: Combination of factors Kill....  by 'Tmoon'   (29 Apr 2011 @ 16:20)
Re: Combination of factors Kill....  by 'Aquila'   (29 Apr 2011 @ 16:50)
Re: Combination of factors Kill....  by 'Tmoon'   (29 Apr 2011 @ 17:32)
Re: Combination of factors Kill....  by 'Shanny'   (29 Apr 2011 @ 17:15)
Re: Combination of factors Kill....  by 'Aquila'   (29 Apr 2011 @ 17:33)
Re: Combination of factors Kill....  by 'kudos'   (29 Apr 2011 @ 22:27)
Re: Combination of factors Kill....  by 'Trev'   (30 Apr 2011 @ 0:12)
Re: Combination of factors Kill....  by 'PaulMRotax'   (30 Apr 2011 @ 9:02)
Re: Combination of factors Kill....  by 'jtthedevil'   (30 Apr 2011 @ 15:35)
Re: Combination of factors Kill....  by 'PaulMRotax'   (30 Apr 2011 @ 20:02)
Re: Combination of factors Kill....  by 'jtthedevil'   (01 May 2011 @ 14:42)
Re: Combination of factors Kill....  by 'QuickOldTimer'   (01 May 2011 @ 17:20)
Re: Combination of factors Kill....  by 'PaulMRotax'   (01 May 2011 @ 19:58)
Re: Combination of factors Kill....  by 'jtthedevil'   (01 May 2011 @ 20:32)
Re: Combination of factors Kill....  by 'PaulMRotax'   (01 May 2011 @ 21:01)
Re: Combination of factors Kill....  by 'jtthedevil'   (01 May 2011 @ 22:02)
Re: Combination of factors Kill....  by 'PaulMRotax'   (01 May 2011 @ 22:46)
Re: Combination of factors Kill....  by 'jtthedevil'   (03 May 2011 @ 1:25)
Re: Combination of factors Kill....  by 'TanglerTKM'   (03 May 2011 @ 1:50)
Re: Combination of factors Kill....  by 'PaulMRotax'   (03 May 2011 @ 13:36)
Re: Combination of factors Kill....  by 'PaulMRotax'   (03 May 2011 @ 13:42)
Re: Paul  by 'davidmc'   (03 May 2011 @ 14:17)
Re: Combination of factors Kill....  by 'PaulMRotax'   (03 May 2011 @ 14:39)
Re: Combination of factors Kill....  by 'Tmoon'   (30 Apr 2011 @ 22:16)
Re: Combination of factors Kill....  by 'kudos'   (30 Apr 2011 @ 22:59)
Re: Combination of factors Kill....  by 'Tmoon'   (01 May 2011 @ 15:29)
Shanny  by 'itpro'   (30 Apr 2011 @ 16:27)
Re: Shanny  by 'Newshound'   (30 Apr 2011 @ 17:35)
Re: Shanny  by 'PaulMRotax'   (30 Apr 2011 @ 20:20)
Re: Shanny  by 'Booney'   (30 Apr 2011 @ 22:08)
Re: Shanny  by 'itpro'   (01 May 2011 @ 1:00)
Re: Shanny  by 'PaulMRotax'   (01 May 2011 @ 7:05)
Re: Shanny  by 'QuickOldTimer'   (01 May 2011 @ 8:48)
Re: Shanny  by 'davidmc'   (01 May 2011 @ 22:34)
Re: Shanny  by 'PaulMRotax'   (01 May 2011 @ 22:53)
Re: Shanny  by 'davidmc'   (01 May 2011 @ 22:57)
Re: Shanny  by 'PaulMRotax'   (01 May 2011 @ 23:20)
David?  by 'Booney'   (01 May 2011 @ 23:15)
Re: David?  by 'MattCortes'   (01 May 2011 @ 23:22)
Re: David?  by 'davidmc'   (02 May 2011 @ 9:21)
Re: David?  by 'PaulMRotax'   (02 May 2011 @ 11:30)
Re: David?  by 'davidmc'   (02 May 2011 @ 12:12)
Re: David?  by 'PaulMRotax'   (02 May 2011 @ 12:44)
Tripe, Dave.... total TRIPE!  by 'itpro'   (02 May 2011 @ 23:18)
Re: Tripe, Dave.... total TRIPE!  by 'QuickOldTimer'   (02 May 2011 @ 23:36)
Re: Tripe, Dave.... total TRIPE!  by 'itpro'   (03 May 2011 @ 13:56)
Volunteer required.  by 'alanrr'   (03 May 2011 @ 14:10)
Re: Volunteer required.  by 'PaulMRotax'   (03 May 2011 @ 14:44)
Re: Tripe, Dave.... total TRIPE!  by 'PaulMRotax'   (03 May 2011 @ 14:48)
Re: Tripe, Dave.... total TRIPE!  by 'PaulMRotax'   (03 May 2011 @ 13:40)
Re: Shanny  by 'PaulMRotax'   (01 May 2011 @ 11:01)
Re: Shanny  by 'Booney'   (01 May 2011 @ 23:08)
Booney...... oh dear.......!  by 'itpro'   (03 May 2011 @ 14:31)
Re: Booney...... oh dear.......!  by 'PaulMRotax'   (03 May 2011 @ 15:20)
Re: Booney...... oh dear.......!  by 'davidmc'   (03 May 2011 @ 17:01)
Re: Booney...... oh dear.......!  by 'PaulMRotax'   (03 May 2011 @ 17:25)
Re: Booney...... oh dear.......!  by 'davidmc'   (03 May 2011 @ 17:55)
Re: Booney...... oh dear.......!  by 'PaulMRotax'   (03 May 2011 @ 19:24)
Re: Booney...... oh dear.......!  by 'davidmc'   (03 May 2011 @ 21:30)
Re: Booney...... oh dear.......!  by 'PaulMRotax'   (03 May 2011 @ 21:51)
Re: Booney...... oh dear.......!  by 'PaulMRotax'   (03 May 2011 @ 21:52)
Ian, answer the question  by 'Booney'   (03 May 2011 @ 19:56)
Re: Ian, answer the question  by 'davidmc'   (03 May 2011 @ 21:06)
Re: Ian, answer the question  by 'PaulMRotax'   (03 May 2011 @ 21:39)
Re: Ian, answer the question  by 'davidmc'   (03 May 2011 @ 23:03)
Re: Ian, answer the question  by 'PaulMRotax'   (04 May 2011 @ 8:35)
Re: errrrrr, you ARE joking, aren't you  by 'itpro'   (04 May 2011 @ 0:50)
Re: errrrrr, you ARE joking, aren't you  by 'PaulMRotax'   (04 May 2011 @ 10:29)
Let's try this another way,,,,,,  by 'itpro'   (04 May 2011 @ 13:29)
Re: Let's try this another way,,,,,,  by 'PaulMRotax'   (04 May 2011 @ 15:03)
Re: Let's try this another way,,,,,,  by 'davidmc'   (04 May 2011 @ 16:00)
Re: Let's try this another way,,,,,,  by 'PaulMRotax'   (04 May 2011 @ 18:56)
Re: Let's try this another way,,,,,,  by 'davidmc'  << You are here!
Booooooneyyyyyy..... where ARE you.....?  by 'itpro'   (05 May 2011 @ 1:31)
Re: Booooooneyyyyyy..... where ARE you.....?  by 'PaulMRotax'   (05 May 2011 @ 8:57)
Re: Let's try this another way,,,,,,  by 'PaulMRotax'   (05 May 2011 @ 8:54)
Attack  by 'itpro'   (30 Apr 2011 @ 16:22)
Re: speed kills ..... but how  by 'jtthedevil'   (30 Apr 2011 @ 15:42)
Re: speed kills ..... but how  by 'kudos'   (30 Apr 2011 @ 22:56)
Re: speed kills ..... but how  by 'itpro'   (01 May 2011 @ 1:05)
Re: speed kills ..... but how  by 'jtthedevil'   (01 May 2011 @ 14:32)

Post a Reply:
You may post a direct reply to this message which will appear in this thread.
To post a new or unrelated message use This Form.
Reply To "Re: Let's try this another way,,,,,,"
Email Address :   Not Registered? Click Here to register...
Password :   Passwords are Case Sensitive!   [ Password Lookup ]
Message Title / Subject :
Message :
Options : Subscribe to this thread?   [ More Information ]

Top of Page
Notice Board Index

[ UK Karting Main Index ]


News Karts and Karting Notice Board Market Place Companies Directory Tracks Directory Events Calendar Race Results Photo Gallery Links
News Karts &
Karting
Notice
Board
Market
Place
Companies
Directory
Tracks
Directory
Events
Calendar
Race
Results
Photo
Gallery
Links

UK Karting

Copyright © 1996-2018 UK Karting
Comments, Suggestions etc. mail@karting.co.uk